Feasibility Study for Enhancing Gait Following Stroke With Implanted Microstimulators

The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research

Status: Completed

Conditions: Hemiparesis

Treatments: Device: Radio-frequency Microstiumulator

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other; Other U.S. Federal agency

Identifiers

NCT01640041

GO70151

AMF-CP-0004

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to test an innovative, advanced FNS microstimulator technology developed by the Alfred Mann Foundation (Santa Clarita, CA) called, the Radio Frequency Microstimulation (RFM) Gait System that promises to provide FNS training for restoration of functional gait components in a manner at least as efficacious as current investigational FNS systems. The design features of the RFM Gait System are intended to address the problems with the current FNS systems. The RFM implant devices are small enough to be inserted using only a 5 mm incision[3]. Because both the electrode (anode and cathode) are contained within the microstimulator, there are no lead wires traversing the skin, joints, or torso/limb junctures. Individual RFMs can be inserted at the motor points and nerves of each of the paretic muscles in the involved limb and coordinated using radio frequency technology.

Full description

The primary objective (Aim I) of this study is to evaluate whether the RFM Gait System can restore the capability to perform the components of gait required for safe, functional walking, for patients in the chronic phase after stroke (> 12 months). We will assess the treatment provided by the RFM system at the Cleveland VA compared to the FNS percutaneous Schreiner electrodes and custom-designed controller previously investigated by the investigators.

The similarities between the RFM-based and percutaneous FNS systems will be assessed using six gait components required for the execution of functional, safe gait, which are lower limb strength, coordination, an index of walking endurance, muscle tone, walking speed, and quality of life.

The secondary objective of this study is to test the technological performance and safety of the RFM Gait System. Measures of technology performance and safety include implantation time; anchoring capability at the motor point of the muscle; reliability of the RFMs during use; reliability of electrical performance of the system; comfort of the system (with stimulation off); comfort of the electrical stimulus.

Enrollment: 1 patient

Sex: All

Ages: 21+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Cognition intact to give valid informed consent to participate.
2. Sufficient endurance to participate in rehabilitation sessions.
3. Ability to follow 2 stage commands, in English.
4. Medically stable.
5. Age > 21 years.
6. Impaired ambulation as follows: inability to flex the knee and ankle in the sagittal plane, in a normal manner so the foot clears the floor, inability to control normal knee angle during single limb weight bearing during stance phase .
7. Minimum trace (Manual Muscle Test score of 1) contraction of hip, knee, and ankle flexors and extensors under volitional control.
8. Passive range of motion at hip, knee, ankle normal gait kinematics.
9. Five degrees (5°) of motion for knee and ankle flexors and extensors produced by muscle stimulation achieved non-invasively with electrical stimulation applied to the skin surface.
10. At least 12 months post stroke.
11. Ability to understand the informed consent form in English.
12. Thigh and lower leg circumference and length ≤ 50th percentile of standard U.S. population morphology measures.*
13. Participants should be able to walk and keep balance without physical assistance
14. Response to Surface Stimulation at a trace for tibialis anterior and peronous longus.
15. Subject with unilateral defects

Exclusion criteria

1. Acute or progressive cardiac, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders or malignancy.
2. Active psychiatric diagnosis or psychological condition, or active drug/alcohol abuse.
3. Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy.
4. More than one stroke.
5. Allergy or contraindication to the anesthesia, Versed, (or comparable substitute).

Trial design

Primary purpose: Device Feasibility

Allocation: N/A

Interventional model: Single Group Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

1 participants in 1 patient group

Implanted

Experimental group

Description:

All participants.

Treatment:

Device: Radio-frequency Microstiumulator