Femtolaser Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Keratoplasty

U

University of Southampton

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Keratoconus
Fuchs Dystrophy
Corneal Disease

Treatments

Procedure: Trephine blade
Procedure: Femtosecond Laser

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03619434
32158

Details and patient eligibility

About

This pilot study will compare upto 15 patients undergoing femtolaser assisted keratoplasty (using CE[Conformité Européene] approved femtolaser apparatus) with upto 15 patients undergoing conventional keratoplasty with a manual trephine. Patients will be randomly assigned to either group. All keratoplasties will be penetrating keratoplasties. The following aims of this research is detailed below: Does femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty ( FLAK ) yield faster visual recovery and better long term BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity)? Does FLAK offer a biomechanically stronger cornea and thereby more safety and less risk of wound dehiscence? Is there any difference between FLAK and conventional keratoplasty in terms of graft failure or rejection? Follow up in best corrected visual acuity, various refraction/astigmatism measurements, intraocular pressure, graft rejection/failure rates, pachymetry and corneal hysteresis and resistance factor will be recorded at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months and 1 year and 18 months postoperatively. This study, to the investigators' knowledge will be the first randomised controlled trial in this area, the first to provide an empirical measurement to biomechanical stability of the cornea with the femtolaser, and the first done in an NHS (National Health Service) setting.

Full description

Introduction The femtosecond laser has had a profound effect on refractive surgery and, more recently, on cataract surgery and cornea transplantation. The superior precision and control offered by femtosecond laser and its potential use in cornea transplantation show promise in terms of wound stability and strength. By doing this research project the investigators aim to answer the following questions: Does femtosecond laser assisted keratoplasty ( FLAK ) yield faster visual recovery and better long term BCVA? Does FLAK offer a biomechanically stronger cornea and thereby more safety and less risk of wound dehiscence? Is there any difference between FLAK and conventional keratoplasty in terms of graft failure or rejection? There have been other studies that have compared femtolaser to the manual trephine in corneal transplant keratoplasty surgery. The investigators' study, to their knowledge, will be the first randomised controlled trial in this area. The majority of interventional studies comparing the two procedures are retrospective case controls. This study, will also be the first to provide an empirical measurement to the biomechanical stability of corneas that have undergone femtolaser corneal transplant. Although theorised to be better with the femtolaser, there has yet to have been a comparative study that has utilised quantitative evidence supporting this. By measuring postoperative corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor using an ocular response analyser, the investigators hope to be able to do that. Recruitment, inclusion/exclusion and method Patients attending the cornea firm at the eye unit in University Hospitals Southampton who are indicated for penetrating keratoplasty as a result of corneal disease or pathology will be recruited. The participants have no connection to the university or the researcher that is known before the research starts. The aim for this study is to have a minimum of 10 patients recruited altogether and a maximum of 30. Inclusion criteria: • Eyes with corneal opacities owing to previous corneal pathology. Exclusion criteria: • Eyes with concomitant ocular pathology which may affect visual acuity. • Eyes who received previous corneal grafts. Only after the patient has given their informed consent and confirmation that they meet the criteria will they be formally included in the study. After inclusion in the study participants will be randomised into two groups of equal numbers to either undergo femtolaser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty or to undergo conventional keratoplasty. Other than the use of instrument to make incisions for the graft on the host cornea, all other aspects of the surgery will be kept as homogenous as possible. Patients will stay overnight or have this operation done as a day case depending on time of day the operation is done. They will then be followed up at 1 day, 1 week, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months in various different visual outcome measurements as well as biomechanical measures of corneal healing. The two groups will be statistically compared at each timepoint. This study also has a further role as a pilot study to assess the feasibility of doing a study like this on a larger scale, as a randomised, controlled trial. Consent Patients who are deemed to not have capacity will not be eligible for this study as they cannot proceed with the consent form. All staff involved in the study have appropriate training in how to judge capacity. For those with capacity, they will read the patient information sheet first. The patient information sheet contains in layman's terms full details for potential research participants, covering issues from why the researchers are doing the study, what the researchers expect from them, the possibility of adverse effects and anonymity and confidentiality. If patients are still interested after that they will receive a consent form to be signed by them. They will be given a copy of the signed consent form to keep. Risks, burdens and benefits Risks are explained in the patient information sheet so patients have a fully informed decision about whether to take part in the study. From the investigators point of view it is important to note these patients for this study are indicated for corneal transplant surgery - that is it is felt the benefits of a conventional surgery outweighs the normal risks of corneal transplant surgery. Femtolaser keratoplasty is not known to add any risks that is not present in conventional keratoplasty. It is CE approved for the use in creating cuts in the cornea, as the surgeons are doing for corneal transplants. Confidentiality The nature of this study means that their details will be known to the surgeons and staff performing the surgery in data collection but these will be coded/anonymised for members of the team involved in other parts of the study, leaving the number of people who know linking details to a minimum. Any documents linking the patient's details to the code will only be the responsibility of the surgeons and their staff. The consent forms themselves will be kept inside a locked storage unit in the Southampton Eye Unit. The patients will be reassured their personal details will not be known to any of the researchers other than the surgeons and their staff that will carry out the surgery.

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

16 to 90 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Eyes with corneal opacities owing to previous corneal pathology.

Exclusion criteria

  • Eyes with concomitant ocular pathology which may affect visual acuity.
  • Eyes who received previous corneal grafts.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Conventional keratoplasty group (Control)
Active Comparator group
Description:
This group will undergo conventional penetrating keratoplasty with a trephine blade.
Treatment:
Procedure: Trephine blade
Femtolaser group
Experimental group
Description:
This group will undergo femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty.
Treatment:
Procedure: Femtosecond Laser

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Parwez N Hossain, MB ChB, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location

Resources

© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems