Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Success rates of cancer treatment have increased significantly resulting in many girls and young women who are treated now and will be cancer survivors. Nevertheless, cancer treatment may result in long term side effects. Damage to the ovaries may result in serious difficulty to become pregnant in the future. The risk of this happening depends, among others upon patient's age, disease and type of treatment she undergoes. Medical research is continuously looking into ways to preserve female fertility by using less toxic protocols. Yet, keeping your eggs outside the body during treatment is an interesting option which as is routine for boys preserving sperm before cancer treatment. This research attempts to freeze eggs either in the ovarian tissue or individually.
Full description
Advances in early detection and increasing success of chemotherapy have made cancer therapy a curable disease. In children and adolescents with cancer, cure rates approach 75%. These cure rates are achieved in great part due to the use of intensive chemotherapy, and in some cases, radiation. The use of these treatment modalities is associated with significant toxicity, including the potential for gonadal damage and subsequent reduced fertility. Aggressive chemotherapy is, however, usually gonadotoxic and results in infertility in many pediatric patients. Ovarian damage is drug and dose dependant and increases with patient age at treatment. Increasing numbers of young cancer survivors are therefore experiencing infertility related to their past cancer treatment. Having children thus becomes an important issue for young cancer patients.
Cryopreservation of sperm is an effective method that is offered to pre- and post-adolescent males. Female gametes were however, not readily amenable to cryopreservation though the use of vitrification recently resulted in improved results. Nevertheless, this method is not applicable for young girls as it requires prolonged induction of ovulation and vaginal sonography to complete aspiration of oocytes. Similarly, In vitro fertilization (IVF) may be offered only to patients beyond adolescence. Ovulation induction requires a few weeks delay in the initiation of cancer treatment.
Since ovarian stimulation is generally not a feasible option for young girls and adolescents, strategies for preserving fertility in these patients usually include ovarian cryopreservation, an experimental technology with some success in animal studies, recently resulting in few deliveries following human transplantations. Although the technique remains investigational, it is being increasingly offered to women undergoing cancer treatment. In prepubertal girls ovarian cryopreservation is the only option for potentially preserving ovarian function. As we and others have shown, it is probable that methods of ovarian transplantation with vascular anastomosis will be applied in the future.
We have recently recommended that following individual consultation by a multi-disciplinary team, all female pediatric cancer patients and their families should be counseled regarding side effects of chemotherapy and be offered ovarian preservation.
The methodology of ovarian cortex preservation, pioneered by Gosden is currently routine in many centers in a few countries. Nevertheless, it is realized that the future use of this cryopreserved ovarian cortex may be limited due to cellular injury during cryopreservation and due to the tissue ischemic damage following transplantation.
Furthermore, cryobanking of ovarian cortex preserves only the smallest (primordial and primary) follicles, since all preovulatory antral follicles, which contain GV stage oocytes will not survive the procedure. We thus currently propose to all patients undergoing ovarian cryopreservation to perform integrated oocyte aspiration from antral follicles of the tissue, followed by in vitro maturation (IVM) and oocyte cryopreservation as an additional fertility-preserving method. The aim of this study was to analyze oocyte detection and IVM success rates in young girls and adolescents using this combined method.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
200 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Assaf Ben Meir, MD; Ariel Revel, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal