ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Fixation of OsseoTi™ Porous Structure Versus PPS (Porous Plasma Spray) Coating on the G7™ Acetabular Component for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

H

Hvidovre University Hospital

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Treatments

Device: THA with G7 OsseoTi coted acetabular component
Device: THA with G7 PPS coted acetabular component

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02316704
G7_RSA_v1.02

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary objective of this project is to investigate, using RSA, acetabular implant migration of the OsseoTi™ G7 acetabular cup in comparison to conventional PPS coated G7 acetabular cup, and compare liner wear of thinnest available E1™ liner, allowing for the largest possible femoral head (36mm-44mm) to E1™ liner holding a 32mm femoral head in the G7 acetabular system with endpoint assessment being performed at the 2 year follow-up.

Enrollment

98 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • • Participants with primary hip osteoarthritis set to receive a primary unilateral uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

    • Participants must be 18-75 years of age.
    • Participants must be able to speak and understand Danish (or depending on country where patient is enrolled).
    • Participants must be able to give informed consent and be cognitively intact.
    • Participants must be expected to be able to complete all postoperative controls.
    • Participants must not have severe comorbidities, ASA-score ≤ 3.

Exclusion criteria

  • Terminal illness.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Previous fracture of the hip.
  • Osteonecrosis of the hip.
  • Previous infection of the hip.
  • Severe bony deformity warranting the use of non-standard implants.
  • Metastasis in the periarticular bone or proximal femur.
  • Female patients that are pregnant or planning pregnancy during follow-up period
  • If bone stock or femoral canal type, assessed on preoperative x-ray, warrants the use of cemented fixation.
  • Documented osteoporosis with patient in active medical treatment.
  • Comorbidity with altered pain perception (e.g. DM with neuropathy).
  • Participants that develop deep infection in the follow-up period are excluded from the project.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

98 participants in 4 patient groups

OsseoTi™ G7 large
Active Comparator group
Description:
OsseoTi™ G7 acetabular cup and an E1™ liner holding largest possible femoral head (36mm-44mm)
Treatment:
Device: THA with G7 PPS coted acetabular component
Device: THA with G7 OsseoTi coted acetabular component
OsseoTi™ G7 32
Active Comparator group
Description:
OsseoTi™ G7 acetabular cup and an E1™ insert holding a 32mm femoral head
Treatment:
Device: THA with G7 PPS coted acetabular component
Device: THA with G7 OsseoTi coted acetabular component
conventional PPS coated G7 large
Active Comparator group
Description:
conventional PPS coated G7 acetabular cup and an E1™ insert holding largest possible femoral head (36mm-44mm)
Treatment:
Device: THA with G7 PPS coted acetabular component
Device: THA with G7 OsseoTi coted acetabular component
conventional PPS coated G7 32
Active Comparator group
Description:
conventional PPS coated G7 acetabular cup and an E1™ insert holding a 32mm femoral head
Treatment:
Device: THA with G7 PPS coted acetabular component
Device: THA with G7 OsseoTi coted acetabular component

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems