ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Flexible Intubation Scope With or Without Video Laryngoscope in Supporting Endotracheal Tube Placement in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Before Surgery

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center logo

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Head and Neck Neoplasm

Treatments

Device: Laryngoscopy
Procedure: Tracheal Intubation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT03757091
NCI-2018-02698 (Registry Identifier)
2018-0661 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

This trial studies how well flexible intubation scope with or without video laryngoscope works in supporting endotracheal tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer before surgery. Flexible intubation scope and video laryngoscope are devices that have a small camera to help the doctor see the patient's airway on a screen. Both devices may help the doctor who gives anesthesia prevent complications from placing the breathing tube (such as pain or mouth injury).

Full description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the rates of difficult endotracheal tube (ETT) placement using a flexible intubation scope (FIS) versus a combination of flexible intubation and video laryngoscopy in difficult airway management.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the ease of using a flexible intubation scope (FIS) with and without the use of the video laryngoscope (VL).

II. Total time for securing the airway.

III. Number of attempts required for intubation.

IV. Rate of failure at intubation.

V. Incidence of desaturation.

VI. Assessment for hoarseness, sore mouth, neck, or jaw, dysphonia, dysphagia, lip injury, tongue injury, or tooth damage.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients undergo flexible scope intubation up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.

ARM B: Patients undergo flexible scope intubation and video laryngoscopy up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.

Enrollment

144 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages ≥ 18 years of age
  • All surgical patients with known or suspected difficult airways that meet at least three (3) of the Difficult Airway criteria [Mallampati III-IV, Neck circumference > 40 cm, Sternomental distance < 12 cm, Thyromental distance < 6 cm, Mouth opening < 4 cm, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, Upper Lip Bite Test - ULBT (class III)] or history of radiation to the head and neck area or oral pathology obstructing the glottic view
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-IV
  • Has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Active bleeding from nasopharynx or oropharynx
  • Trismus
  • Oral pathology obstructing the glottic view
  • Planned awake or nasal intubation
  • Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB) contraindicated post-induction
  • Emergency endotracheal intubation and patients intubated pre and post-surgery
  • Surgical procedures such as Tracheostomy, Laryngectomy, Esophagectomy
  • Patient refusal or inability to consent for study participation
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) V
  • Pregnant females

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

144 participants in 2 patient groups

Arm A (flexible intubation scope)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients undergo flexible scope intubation up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.
Treatment:
Procedure: Tracheal Intubation
Arm B (flexible intubation scope,video laryngoscope)
Experimental group
Description:
Patients undergo flexible scope intubation and video laryngoscopy up to 2 attempts following induction of general anesthesia and adequate manual ventilation. In case of failed 2 attempts, patients undergo a third attempt utilizing another technique or device.
Treatment:
Procedure: Tracheal Intubation
Device: Laryngoscopy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Carin Hagberg

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems