Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of targeting the newly discovered SCAN versus traditional effector-specific networks in M1 using multimodal imaging and rTMS in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main question it aims to answer is: Is rTMS targeting the SCAN more effective than rTMS targeting effector networks?
Full description
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder commonly affecting middle-aged and elderly individuals. Besides conventional treatments such as medication (e.g., levodopa) and surgery (e.g., deep brain stimulation), non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have been widely used as a safe and well-tolerated non-pharmacological adjunct therapy for PD patients. However, the limited efficacy of TMS may be attributed to an incomplete understanding of PD-related cortical circuits and imprecise targeting.
Historically, the primary motor cortex (M1) has been selected as the repetitive TMS (rTMS) target for PD treatment. In 2022, Gordon et al. discovered a new network within the M1 that differs from effector-specific networks responsible for executing movements of specific body parts, such as those for the foot, hand, and face. This newly identified network, named the somato-cognitive action network (SCAN), is located in inter-effector regions and is responsible for motor planning, control, and coordination. Damage to this network correlates with key PD symptoms, making SCAN a promising new target for PD intervention.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of targeting the newly discovered SCAN versus traditional effector-specific networks in M1 using multimodal imaging and Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a rapid form of rTMS. The objective is to provide new clinical evidence for non-invasive neuromodulation in Parkinson's disease.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
36 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal