ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Follow-Up Study of CARTISTEM® Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Knee Articular Cartilage Injury or Defect

M

Medipost

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Degenerative Osteoarthritis
Defect of Articular Cartilage

Treatments

Biological: CARTISTEM
Procedure: Microfracture

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT01626677
CARTISTEM_CR_F/U

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a long term follow-up study to investigate the safety and efficacy of CARTISTEM®, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, in repair of cartilage injury or defects, compared with microfracture. Subjects who participated in and completed the Phase III trial (NCT01041001) will be tracked until the 60 month post-treatment timepoint.

Full description

This long term follow-up study is performed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of CARTISTEM®, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, in repair of cartilage injury or defects, compared with microfracture. Subjects, who were either administered CARTISTEM or treated with conventional microfracture in the primary phase III study (NCT01041001), will be further observed using various subjective knee assessments and MRI T2 mapping until the 60 month post-treatment timepoint.

Enrollment

103 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with knee joint cartilage defect or injury of ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) Grade 4 confirmed by arthroscopy (At screening, patients diagnosed as such with an MRI may be included)
  • Male or female patients at least 18 years of age
  • Patients whose lesion (unilateral joint) is 2 ㎠ ~ 9㎠ in size
  • Patients with articular swelling, tenderness and active range of motion of Grade 2 or below
  • Patients with pain in affected joint of 60-mm or below on a 100-mm VAS (visual analogue scale)
  • Patients with adequate blood coagulation activity: PT(INR) < 1.5, APTT <1.5×control
  • Patients with adequate renal function: Creatinine ≤ 2.0 ㎎/㎗, levels of proteinuria measured with Dipstick: trace or less
  • Patients with adequate hepatic function: Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 ㎎/㎗, AST/ALT ≤ 100 IU/L
  • Patients who have received no surgery or radiation therapy in the affected joint within the past 6 six weeks, and have recovered from the side effects of such past treatments
  • Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to practice adequate methods of birth control to prevent pregnancy during the study
  • Patients whose physical examination results show no ligament instability of Grade II or above (Grade 0: none, Grade I: 0-5 mm, Grade II: 5-10 mm, Grade III: >10 mm)
  • Patients who voluntarily agreed to enroll in the study and signed an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with autoimmune disease or the medical history
  • Patients with infections requiring parenteral administration of antibiotics
  • Patients with myocardial infarction, ischemic heart failure, other serious heart conditions or uncontrolled hypertension, or any medical history of such diseases
  • Patients with serious internal diseases
  • Patients who are currently pregnant or nursing
  • Patients with psychotic diseases, epilepsy, or any history of such diseases
  • Patients with alcohol abuse
  • Patients who smoke excessively
  • Patients with chronic inflammatory articular diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis
  • Patients who were enrolled in any other clinical trials within the past four weeks
  • Patients who had been administered with immunosuppressants such as Cyclosporin A or azathioprine within the past six weeks
  • Patients whose physical examination results show ligament instability of Grade II or above (Grade 0: none, Grade I: 0-5 mm, Grade II: 5-10 mm, Grade III: >10 mm)
  • Patients with a known history of hypersensitivity/allergy to gentamicin
  • Patients whom the principal investigator considers inappropriate for the clinical trial due to any other reasons than those listed above

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

103 participants in 2 patient groups

CARTISTEM
Experimental group
Description:
A single dose of 500㎕/㎠ of cartilage defect
Treatment:
Biological: CARTISTEM
Microfracture
Active Comparator group
Description:
conventional treatment method
Treatment:
Procedure: Microfracture

Trial contacts and locations

10

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems