ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Forced Versus Spray Coagulation in Women Undergoing LLETZ-conization for Cervical Dysplasia: a Randomized Trial (CONE-1)

R

Ruhr University of Bochum

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Treatments

Procedure: Forced
Procedure: Spray

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

In a randomized clinical trial of 120 women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-conization for cervical dysplasia, two coagulation modes, spray versus forced coagulation, will be compared. The primary outcome of the study is time to complete hemostasis, secondary outcomes are intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and postoperative bleeding complications.

Full description

Intraoperative bleeding during large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-conization can be achieved by two modes of electrocoagulation, spray coagulation and forced coagulation. Spray coagulation is a superficial coagulation mode, whereas forced coagulation is a deep tissue coagulation mode. It is unknown, whether spray or forced coagulation is superior regarding intraoperative hemostasis and other outcome Parameters such as postoperative bleeding and postoperative pain. Therefore, the investigator designed a randomized clinical trial of 120 women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-conization for cervical dysplasia, comparing the two coagulation modes, spray coagulation and forced coagulation, The primary outcome of the study is time to complete hemostasis measured in seconds, secondary outcomes are intraoperative blood loss measured as difference in serum hemoglobin pre- and postoperatively, postoperative pain according to a 10 step VAS scale, and postoperative bleeding complications, defined as necessity to intervene surgically for vaginal bleeding up to 14 days postoperatively. The study Population consists of women undergoing LLETZ-conization for histologically proven cervical dysplasia. The study hypothesis states that the difference in the mean time until complete hemostais will be at least 1/3 shorter in women randomized to spray coagulation. With a study Population of 120 women, this study has a power of >80% to detect a difference of 1/3 of the mean coagulation time until complete hemostais based on an anticipated mean time of 85 seconds.

Enrollment

160 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • histologically proven cervical dysplasia
  • colposcopy Prior to LLETZ-conization
  • informed consent
  • no known hematologic disorder

Exclusion criteria

  • significant language barrier
  • a personal history of LLETZ-conization

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

160 participants in 2 patient groups

Spray
Experimental group
Description:
cervical coagulation using a superficial electrical coagulation mode, ie spray coagulation
Treatment:
Procedure: Spray
Forced
Active Comparator group
Description:
cervical coagulation using a deep tissue electrical coagulation mode, ie forced coagulation
Treatment:
Procedure: Forced

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems