Foundations in Developing Precision Cognitive Restoration
Status
Conditions
Treatments
Details and patient eligibility
About
This pilot study tests the merits of a unique research approach, transdiagnostic sampling. For Veterans with similar levels of cognitive impairments cause by different types of brain injuries (stroke or traumatic brain injury), this study examines effects of two cognitive restorative treatments. Instead of using the traditional approach to examine treatment effects strictly by cause of brain injury, the transdiagnostic sampling approach recognizes that cause of injury does not drive treatment responsiveness of recovery.
Full description
The purpose of this study is to identify the supports and barriers to scalability of Veteran-tailored iTBS and APT across neurologic conditions, with the longer-term goal of providing an empirical basis for the tailoring of a broader range of cognitive rehabilitation strategies to optimize each Veteran's cognitive function in daily life. After Veterans receive standard cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive impairments often persist and if they do make gains there is limited carry-over to daily function. The tenets of precision neurorehabilitation suggest that tailored interventions will optimize gains and carry-over, but precision-tailoring of cognitive rehabilitation will only be possible if researchers develop and test scalable approaches for identifying, organizing, and analyzing the multitude of Veteran-specific variables driving and influencing treatment responsiveness. This project addresses long-standing scientific barriers to understanding treatment responsiveness, particularly study sample heterogeneity and individual variability. The investigators address study sample heterogeneity by linking Veterans, across TBI and ischemic stroke, according to levels of cognitive impairment. The investigators create a cohort of Veterans with a homogeneous level of cognitive impairment, thereby enabling explication of person-centric factors influencing treatment responsiveness and carry-over to daily function. Advancing understanding of the basic study design elements will be achieved by leveraging the knowledge of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and iTBS paired with Attention Processing Training exercises (iTBS + APT). iTBS is advantageous as it robustly improves working memory with just one treatment session. These interventions, together, are advantageous as they can each be tailored to a Veteran's unique cognitive challenges and to target the neural site, unique to each Veteran's neuropathology. These two interventions also directly address cognitive deficits, while simultaneously inducing neuroplasticity in neural regions hampered or impaired by neural injury. The investigators will study Veterans with moderately impaired cognition who, after standard cognitive rehabilitation, continue to struggle with daily life requiring assistance with complex instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Veterans will participate in a series of two within-subject treatment studies, conducted on two separate days, 2-weeks apart. Veterans will be randomly assigned to first receive a single session of Active iTBS or Placebo iTBS and then they will receive APT paired with their assigned iTBS (Active iTBS + APT vs Placebo iTBS + APT). The investigators will test if diagnosis moderates the effects of these interventions on both immediate and persisting change in cognition. For immediate effects, the investigators use a novel testing battery and for persisting gains the investigators use established and feasible neuropsychological tests as well as an established test of cognitive function during IADL. Results will be used to obtain pilot data and examine feasibility in terms of study attrition relative to Veteran fatigue, mood, and Veteran reports of suitability of key aspects of the study design. These findings will be used to develop a future merit within-subject cross-over study examining the over-arching hypothesis that tailored iTBS and APT applied to a transdiagnostic sample and subsequently matched to a Veteran, according to a biotype algorithm, will result in better functional performance of Veteran-valued IADL.
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of TBI or Ischemic Stroke
- 2-10 years post neurologic event having completed rehabilitation
- Age 18 - 80 years old
- Medically stable
- Fluent in English
- Moderately impaired cognitive function as defined by AMPS Processing sub-scale measures falling below 1.0 logits
- Moderately impaired cognitive capacity as defined by having two or more scores falling 1 standard deviation below age normed expectations on: the RBANS index scores, DKEFS Color-Word Trials 3 and 4 scale scores, and/or WAIS-IV Digit Span scaled score
Exclusion criteria
- Have BOTH TBI and Ischemic Stroke
- Intracranial lesions or hemorrhagic stroke
- Other primary neurologic diagnosis
- Any dementia diagnosis
- Reside in an extended care facility
- Less than 2 years post TBI or ischemic stroke
- Anti-epileptic medications for seizure activity
- Seizure within the past 3 months or active seizure
- Contraindications to MRI/iTBS
- Medication changes within 3 months of starting participation
- Currently receiving therapy services
- Pregnancy
- FIM scores for problem solving <3 or >4 OR memory <4 or >5, or changes in FIM scores during screening process
- Neurostimulants that cannot be safely withdrawn
- Bilateral ischemic stroke
- Mild or severe impairments in cognitive capacity or cognitive function
- CHF, implanted pacemakers or defibrillators, or cochlear implants
- Questionable test validity as indicated by DOT (E-score 17) or BRIEF (Negativity 6; Infrequency 3; Inconsistency 8)
- RBANS Total Scale < 70
- History of/or symptoms of psychotic spectrum disorders (i.e., bipolar, schizophrenia)
- Persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and/or substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses confirmed by clinical and/or scientific experts
Trial design
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
0 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Trial contacts and locations
Loading...
Central trial contact
Elyse R Walsh, DPT; Theresa L Pape, DrPH MA BS
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal