Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This prospective randomized controlled study will be conducted to compare the effect of fractionated SA using isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fractionated SA using hyperbaric bupivacaine and the conventional SA on hemodynamic instability in orthogeriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgeries.
Full description
Hip fractures are one of the most common reasons for elderly patients to present to the emergency department and require urgent surgery. Despite the debate regarding the preferred type of anesthesia in the elderly population, spinal anesthesia has shown the advantage of the simplicity of the technique, the better analgesic profile, the lower incidence of thromboembolic events and lower hospital stay. Hemodynamic stability should be considered as a primary intraoperative target. In pursuit of optimizing spinal anesthesia, this study proposed that fractionated SA by sequential administration of low doses of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine can minimize hemodynamic instability while leveraging the advantages of both solutions when compared with fractionated SA using hyperbaric bupivacaine or the conventional SA technique.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
108 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Mai Salah Salem, MD anesthesia, SIC and pain ma
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal