Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Determine whether full-time patching is more effective than observation for improving distance control of IXT after 3 months of treatment (on-treatment outcome).
Full description
Understanding the effectiveness of intensive patching has important implications for managing children with IXT. If full-time patching is associated with improvement in distance control vs an observation group, then future studies can be conducted to evaluate different durations of full-time patching treatment, whether the effect is maintained off-treatment, and how full-time patching compares to other treatment strategies.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether full-time patching is more effective than observation for improving distance control of IXT after 3 months of treatment (on-treatment outcome).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Children under the care of a pediatric optometrist or pediatric ophthalmologist will be eligible for the study if they meet all the following criteria:
Age 3 to < 9 years
IXT meeting all of the following criteria:
Age-normal visual acuity in both eyes:
Interocular difference in distance VA of 2 logMAR lines or less (10 letters or less on E-ETDRS for patients ≥7 years old). Testing by ATS HOTV for participants 3 to < 7 years old and by E-ETDRS for participants ≥7 years old.
Cycloplegic refraction within the last 7 months.
Refractive error between -6.00 D SE and +2.00 D SE (inclusive) based on a cycloplegic refraction within 7 months
Participants with refractive error meeting any of the following based on a cycloplegic refraction within 6 months must be wearing spectacles for at least 2 weeks:
Any refractive correction worn at enrollment (required or not) must meet the following guidelines based on a cycloplegic refraction within 7 months:
Anisometropia SE must be within 0.50 D of the full anisometropic difference correction
Astigmatism must be corrected within 0.50 D
Axis must be within ±10 degrees if cylinder power is ≤1.00 D and within ±5 degrees if cylinder power is >1.00 D.
For hyperopia, the spherical component can be reduced at investigator discretion provided the reduction is symmetrical and does not meet the definition of deliberate overminus (see below).
For myopia, the intent is to fully correct, but the spherical component can be undercorrected at investigator discretion provided the reduction is symmetrical and results in no more than -0.50 D SE residual (i.e., uncorrected) myopia. Deliberate overminus is not allowed.
Deliberate overminus is defined for this protocol as any refractive correction prescribed to yield lenses that are overminused by more than -0.50D SE than cycloplegic refraction SE
For refractive errors with an emmetropic or myopic SE, the intent is to fully correct, but the spherical component can be undercorrected at investigator discretion provided the reduction is symmetrical and results in no more than -0.50 D SE residual (i.e., uncorrected) myopia. Prescribing a correction that yields more than 0.50 D more minus SE than the cycloplegic refraction SE is considered deliberate overminus and is not allowed.
Note that the refractive correction guidelines and the requirement to wear refractive correction for at least 2 weeks apply not only to participants who require refractive correction under the above criteria but also to any other participant who is wearing refractive correction.
Gestational age > 30 weeks
Birth weight > 1500 grams
Patient and/or parent understands protocol, is willing to enroll, and is willing to accept that other (i.e., nonrandomized) treatment for IXT will not be offered by the investigator for 3 months
Parent has phone and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff
Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site within 3 months not anticipated
Exclusion criteria
Individuals meeting any of the following criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
72 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Raymond T Kraker, MSPH; Katie M Stutz
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal