Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Bile duct injury (BDI) remains the most feared complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, particularly in difficult gallbladder cases. The fundus-first technique has emerged as a potentially safer alternative to classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy for challenging cases. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FF-LC) versus classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (C-LC) in 174 patients with difficult gallbladder characteristics. The primary outcome was bile duct injury rate. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, operative parameters, and postoperative complications.
Full description
Bile duct injury (BDI) rates remain 0.3-1.5% in difficult gallbladders. FFLC avoids early dissection near critical structures, potentially lowering BDI risk.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the safety and efficacy of fundus-first (FF) versus classical (Calot-first) laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques in patients with difficult gallbladders. The study will evaluate perioperative outcomes, conversion rates, complications, and operative time between the two surgical approaches. Based on recent evidence suggesting an improved safety profile with the fundus-first technique, we hypothesize that the FF approach will demonstrate reduced bile duct injury rates and improved surgical outcomes in difficult cases.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
174 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Saleh K Saleh, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal