ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Gene Expression Study Between Two Dermal Injectables Hydroxylapatite Semi-permanent Filler (Sculptra)

Galderma logo

Galderma

Status

Completed

Conditions

Gene Expression

Treatments

Device: Sculptra
Device: Radiesse Plus

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT05620043
GLI.04.US.SL.020

Details and patient eligibility

About

To compare gene expression stimulated by a semi-permanent filler and a biostimulator via punch biopsy

Full description

This is a randomized, single-center, comparative study to evaluate gene expression after treatment with a semi-permanent filler or a biostimulator.

This study is designed to enroll and randomize approximately 20 subjects in a 1:1 ratio of treatment to PLLA or CaHA. All randomized subjects are to have contour deficiency at the nasolabial folds.

Eligible subjects randomized to receive punch biopsy followed by treatment injection by the Treating Investigator at baseline. The method of injection was at the discretion of the Treating Investigator. A sufficient amount of product is injected to achieve optimal correction of the nasolabial folds, in the opinion of the Treating Investigator. PLLA group receives a second treatment at week 4 while CaHA group receives an optional touch-up if needed.

All subjects have final follow-up visit for a second punch biopsy on the other side of the nasolabial fold.

Enrollment

21 patients

Sex

All

Ages

22 to 50 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject with a minimum of shallow nasolabial fold (NLF) contour deficiencies as assessed via the wrinkle assessment scale
  • Subject with identical WAS scores on both NLFs
  • Ability of giving consent for participation in the study
  • Agreement to have skin biopsies on NLFs

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant NLF asymmetry, or different WAS score on each NLF
  • Pregnant, planning pregnancy during the course of the study or breastfeeding
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the treatment products
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to anesthetics or lidocaine

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

21 participants in 2 patient groups

Poly L-Lactic Acid (PLLA)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Lyophilized PLLA with sodium carboxymethylcellulose, non-pyrogenic mannitol. Treatment needs to be reconstituted prior to injection, following product instruction.
Treatment:
Device: Sculptra
Calcium Hydroxylapatite (CaHA)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Opaque, sterile, non-pyrogenic, semi-solid, cohesive implant whose component is synthetic CaHA suspended in a gel carrier of glycerin, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.3% lidocaine hydrochloride, and sterile water. Treatment injection follows product instruction.
Treatment:
Device: Radiesse Plus

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems