Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Background: Proper selection of anesthetic technique is important in middle ear microsurgery. Controlled hypotension in ear surgery decreases blood loss with improved quality of the surgical field, however, it is associated with resistance to vasodilators and delayed recovery from anesthesia. The use of local anesthetic technique alone in middle ear surgery decreases bleeding and reduces postoperative pain, however, pain on injection, noise, and head-neck position had been reported with the increased risk of patient injuries.
This study aimed to compare the effects of local ear block combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone, regarding intraoperative hemodynamics, anesthetic consumption, recovery characteristics, postoperative pain, adverse effects and postoperative complications.
Full description
Eighty adult patients undergoing middle ear surgery (tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy) were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized into two equal groups (40 patients each). A standardized general anesthetic technique was used in both groups. Group I, received general anesthesia combined with ear block using 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and (Group II), received general anesthesia alone combined with ear block using 10 ml saline. Propofol 2-3 mg /Kg was administered to induce anesthesia, which was maintained using isoflurane. Hemodynamic variables, surgical conditions including the quality of the operative field, intraoperative fentanyl, vasodilators (propranolol and nitroglycerine), isoflurane consumption, recovery time, postoperative pain, total analgesics consumption and postoperative complications were recorded
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
80 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal