Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Cigarette smoking remains common, particularly in rural areas, despite ample evidence that smoking causes cancer and respiratory disease. Successful smoking cessation yields the majority of its health benefits (e.g., avoidance of lung cancer) after years of sustained behavioral change; however, people who smoke cigarettes tend to show elevated rates of delay discounting (i.e., devaluation of delayed outcomes) and a bias for immediate gratification. The overall goal of this project is to develop different versions of an episodic future thinking intervention (i.e., visualization of the future) and test their feasibility and efficacy for smoking cessation in rural and urban populations.
Full description
Cigarette smoking causes more than a dozen cancers, including cancers of the head and neck, colon, bladder, and lung. Although quitting smoking drastically reduces the risk of cancer mortality, rates of cessation are low, particularly in rural areas and other communities. Current evidence-based treatments for smoking cessation have made progress, but substantial room for innovation remains and novel strategies are needed. Successful smoking cessation may be considered, in part, an intertemporal choice between continuing to smoke and achieving the delayed health benefits associated with quitting (e.g., avoidance of lung cancer). Thus, quitting requires one's behavior to be sufficiently motivated by future outcomes. Unfortunately, robust cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence indicates that people who smoke cigarettes show elevated delay discounting, or a bias for immediate gratification. Prior research shows that delay discounting predicts treatment failure and relapse in smoking cessation. These findings suggest that delay discounting often prevents successful quitting because the health benefits of cessation (e.g., avoiding cancer) are too delayed to motivate sustained behavioral change. Thus, delay discounting is a therapeutic target in smoking cessation, where interventions that increase valuation of future outcomes may facilitate quitting. Episodic future thinking (EFT) is one such scalable intervention that is designed to shift time perspective and reduce bias for immediate gratification by promoting vivid and frequent visualization of a broad range of personally significant future events (e.g., weddings, birthdays, spending time with loved ones). In laboratory studies, research has shown that this form of generalized EFT in cigarette smokers reduces delay discounting and motivation to smoke (i.e., cigarette consumption, craving, and valuation). Moreover, strong preliminary evidence suggests that cancer-related EFT, a novel form of the intervention that involves visualizing the future experience of smoking-related lung cancer, may be more efficacious for reducing urges to smoke than the generalized form. The proposed trial will adapt both forms of EFT (generalized and cancer-related) for clinical use in smoking cessation. Remote intervention delivery and outcomes assessment (breath carbon monoxide and number of cigarettes smoked per day) will be used to minimize clinical burden and increase intervention reach and access, including in rural populations who often lack access to evidence-based treatments for smoking cessation. In an eight-week proof-of-concept trial, participants will be prompted to engage in EFT or control episodic thinking multiple times per day and during acute craving episodes. Specific Aims 1 and 2 will examine the feasibility and efficacy, respectively, of generalized and cancer-related EFT to reduce smoking. An Exploratory Aim will investigate the potential moderating role of income, education, sex, and other characteristics (e.g., baseline delay discounting, cigarettes/day) in the effects of EFT on smoking outcomes.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
134 participants in 4 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jeffrey Stein, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal