Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the CYP2C19 genotype-guided abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy versus the un-guided stepwise intensity de-escalation of DAPT strategy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Full description
Current guidelines recommend reducing the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (abbreviated DAPT) or de-escalating P2Y12 inhibitor intensity (de-escalation therapy) in patients at risk of major bleeding, even in patients with acute coronary syndromes. A network meta-analysis that indirectly compared these two strategies found that abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy reduced major bleeding compared with de-escalated dual antiplatelet therapy.
Unlike prasugrel and ticagrelor, which are potent P2Y12 inhibitors, clopidogrel is activated in the liver via the cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) metabolic pathway to exert its antiplatelet effects. Its use as monotherapy requires caution, given that CYP2C19 genotypes that may be resistant to clopidogrel are more prevalent in Asian populations than in Western populations.
Therefore, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and confirm the efficacy and safety of an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (Abbreviated DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy) strategy based on CYP2C19 genetic testing and a step-down DAPT strategy (De-escalation therapy) after 1 month of maintenance potent P2Y12 inhibitor-based dual antiplatelet therapy in patients at HBR who underwent PCI for ACS.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
3,000 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ki Hong Choi, MD, PhD; Joo-Yong Hahn, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal