ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Goal Directed Ammonia Lowering Therapy in Hyperammonemic ACLF Patients With no Overt HE to Reduce Major Adverse Liver Related Outcomes (GOAL Trial)

I

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Acute on Chronic Liver Failure

Treatments

Drug: Lactulose
Other: Standard Medical treatment
Drug: Rifaximin

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06808009
ILBS-ACLF-23

Details and patient eligibility

About

SIRS in ACLF exacerbate adverse effects of ammonia - sarcopenia, infections, immune dysfunction, HE and organ dysfunction Persistent or incident hyperammonemia during first week of hospitalization in patients with ACLF is associated with increased risk of organ failure and death. Prospective studies on the efficacy of ammonia lowering therapies on major adverse liver related outcomes (MALO) (any of AARC III, bacterial infection, overt HE grade or death) in hyperammonemic ACLF patients with no overt HE are limited. In this study we aim to to compare the safety and efficacy of ammonia lowering therapy (goal directed lactulose and rifaximin) compared to SMT to prevent major liver related outcomes (MALO) (any of AARC III, bacterial infection, overt HE grade or death) in hyperammonemic ACLF patients with no overt HE.

Full description

Hypothesis: Goal directed ammonia lowering therapy in hyperammonemic ACLF patients with no overt HE leads to reduced incidence of major adverse liver related outcomes (MALO) (any of AARC III, bacterial infection, overt HE grade or death) at day 7, 28 and day 90.

AIM:- To compare the safety and efficacy of ammonia lowering therapy (goal directed lactulose and rifaximin) compared to SMT to prevent major liver related outcomes (MALO) (any of AARC III, bacterial infection, overt HE grade or death) in hyperammonemic ACLF patients with no overt HE.

Study design:

  • A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
  • Single Centre.
  • Open label.
  • Block Randomization will be done , it will be implemented by IWRS method.
  • The study will be conducted in Department of Hepatology, ILBS.

Enrollment

90 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 70 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18-70 years
  2. ACLF as per APASL criteria (AARC grade I/II)
  3. Baseline ammonia levels of ≥135ug/dl or 79.5umol/l
  4. Given informed consent

Exclusion criteria

    1. Overt HE 2. AARC grade III 3. Confirmed or suspected bacterial infection 4. Extrahepatic organ failure 5. Renal dysfunction lasting for more than 48 hours or need for vasoconstrictors 6. Paralytic ileus 7. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria or any other neoplastic disorder 8. Pregnant and lactating women 9. Use of lactulose, rifaximin or LOLA in past 48h 10. Uncontrolled DM, HT, CAD 11. Patients with allergy or other contraindications of the used drugs

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

90 participants in 2 patient groups

lactulose and rifaximin
Experimental group
Description:
T. Rifaximin 550 mg po bd Syp Lactulose to ensure 2-3 motions
Treatment:
Drug: Rifaximin
Drug: Lactulose
Standard Medical Treatment
Active Comparator group
Description:
Routine medicines, Albumin Iv antibiotics,Protein powder , branched chain amino acids
Treatment:
Other: Standard Medical treatment

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Dr Shreya Singh, MD; Dr Ankur Jindal, DM

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems