Goal Directed Therapy Versus Standard Care in Lung Resection Surgery (GDT-thorax Study).

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla

Status: Completed

Conditions: Fluid Therapy; Goal Directed Therapy

Treatments: Procedure: Standard care; Procedure: Goal directed therapy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03245372

2017/118

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary aim of this study is to quantify and compare the hemodynamic control of cardiac index in patients who receive either goal-directed therapy or standard hemodynamic management in lung resection surgery

Full description

The investigators hypothesize that the percentage of the intraoperative time in which the cardiac index is equal or superior to 2.2 l/min/m2 is higher in goal directed therapy

Enrollment: 31 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Adults patients ( 18 years old)
• Written informed consent
• Elective lung resection surgery (open or thoracoscopic lung lobectomy)

Exclusion criteria

• Severe obesity
• Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency
• Renal failure requiring hemodialysis
• Left ventricle ejection fraction less than 35 %
• Urgent surgery

Trial design

Primary purpose: Supportive Care

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Triple Blind

---

31 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard care

Active Comparator group

Description:

Basic intraoperative hemodynamic objectives

Treatment:

Procedure: Standard care

Goal directed therapy

Experimental group

Description:

Target value is a cardiac index equal or superior to 2.2 l/min/m2.

Treatment:

Procedure: Goal directed therapy