Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal irrigation with Xylitol or saline are effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis and fatigue symptoms associated with Gulf War Illness.
Full description
Background: Gulf War Illness (GWI) results in tremendous impact to quality of life. Symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and fatigue are the first (47%) and third (41%) most common symptoms of patients with GWI, respectively. These symptoms are biologically characterized by a milieu of elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines; to date, the profile of these cytokines in serum and nasal secretions is incompletely understood and has not been assessed in response to therapy. Nasal irrigation (NI) is a therapy which bathes the nasal cavity with a solution (liquid). There are two promising forms of NI; saline NI (S-NI) is hypothesized to improve sinus symptoms by thinning and clearing mucus and inflammatory mediators, decreasing mucosal edema and improving ciliary function. Xylitol NI (X-NI) has been shown to change the salinity of the mucosal surface resulting in enhanced antimicrobial properties. Although NI is an evidence-based adjunctive therapy for CRS and has been reported to be effective for CRS and fatigue, it has not been assessed in a GWI population.
Specific Aims, Hypotheses and Study Design: The specific aims of this proposal are to determine whether routine care plus S-NI, or X-NI, compared to routine care alone, result in improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are cost-effective and decrease proinflammatory bias in subjects with GWI who suffer from CRS and fatigue.
Consistent with our specific aims, we will test the following hypotheses: In an RCT setting, at 26 weeks post-enrollment, adults with GWI and symptoms of CRI and fatigue, treated with routine care plus S-NI or X-NI, compared to those treated with routine care alone, will demonstrate:
H1: improved HRQoL: a) sinus-disease specific HRQoL as evaluated by the validated Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-20) questionnaire (primary outcome measure); b) fatigue-specific HRQoL as assessed by the validated questionnaire, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI); and c) overall HRQoL as assessed by the validated questionnaire the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36; mental and physical health domains) augmented with 18 sleep- and breathing related questions.
H.2: greater cost-effectiveness as measured by the average cost of the intervention divided by the average effectiveness (as assessed by a improvement in SNOT-20 scores), and reported as the "dollars spent per subject restored to health."
H.3: improved treatment satisfaction as assessed by a single-item treatment satisfaction score and a qualitative exit interview.
H.4: improved proinflammatory bias: a) reduced activation and dysregulation of proinflammatory pathways as determined by a reduction in URI-specific inflammatory cytokines in serum and nasal secretions; and b) improved serum-based complete blood count, sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, or nasal swab-based neutrophil or eosinophil counts.
Study Design: 26 week duration of follow-up, 3-arm RCT (N=75). All groups will utilize routine care for their GWI and symptoms of CRS and fatigue. Groups 1 and 2 will in addition add S-NI or X-NI twice daily to their routine care, respectively. Group 3 will continue to use routine care with no other additions (control group); control group participants will be offered NI training and related materials (xylitol or saline per subject preference) after they complete their 26-week follow-up period.
Impact: Positive findings would suggest a number of important effects:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal