Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Randomized controlled trial for comparison of the hand dysfunction in coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal vs conventional radial access
Full description
Coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal radial access has gradually become an alternative access to the conventional radial access because of its advantages of reducing radial artery occlusion (RAO), shortening compression time, and decreasing patient discomfort. However, as awareness of distal radial access has increased, some patients have been found to have symptoms such as abnormal hand sensation and inflexibility after the procedure.
The primary objective is to assess hand function after coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal vs conventional radial access at 24 hours and 1 month.
Hand sensory and motor dysfunction will be assessed by:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
640 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Feng Li, Ms; Gaojun Cai, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal