ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Handheld-multimedia Versus Oral Midazolam in Pediatric on Perioperative Anxiety

U

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 4

Conditions

Ambulatory Surgery
Preanesthetic Medication
Circumcision
Tonsillectomy
Inhalation Anesthesia
Dental Care
Perioperative Anxiety

Treatments

Drug: Midazolam oral solution
Device: IPAD

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04273035
2019-004671-39 (EudraCT Number)
2019/318

Details and patient eligibility

About

The first goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between anxiolysis by multimedia-distraction with an IPAD versus anxiolysis by premedication with midazolam prior to the induction. Secondly to evaluate the need for midazolam-premedication in pediatric day-care patients induced by inhalational anesthesia.

Full description

Perioperative anxiety in children is a common multifactorial influenced and triggered entity with an incidence as high as 50%. Especially (mask)induction of anesthesia is considered one of the most stressful experiences for a child undergoing surgery. A common practice worldwide to diminish the level of anxiety prior to anesthesia is premedication with the benzodiazepine midazolam in order to improve cooperation during induction.

Premedication with midazolam has a primary purpose to reduce preoperative anxiety and has inherent to a benzodiazepine its sedative effects. Although these effects are implied, negative effects of premedication: respiratory complications, paradoxical negative behavior has been reported. Although alternative medications have been studied, studies for non-pharmacological anxiety-reduction remain limited.

Non-pharmacological anxiety-reduction by distraction including Tablet or IPAD-multimedia might be a readily available alternative for midazolam premedication. Potentially limiting the use of psychoactive agents, limiting the need for preoperative sedation and therefore possibly decrease secondary respiratory complications in pediatric surgical day-care.

Objective:

The first goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between anxiolysis by multimedia-distraction with an IPAD versus anxiolysis by premedication with midazolam prior to the mask-induction of anesthesia. Secondly to evaluate the need for midazolam premedication in pediatric day-care surgery patients induced by inhalational anesthesia.

Enrollment

150 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

1 to 8 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 1 year and <8 years old
  • ASA class 1 or 2 (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System)
  • Elective circumcision, tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy, dental care procedure in day-care
  • Written informed consent by the legal parents or caretaker

Exclusion criteria

  • Parents of the patient wish not to participate with the study
  • Parents are not able to give informed consent (language barrier, legally incapable)
  • A contraindication for the use of premedication with midazolam
  • A known allergy to midazolam
  • A contraindication for premedication in general
  • A contraindication for the use of a gas-induction/gas-anesthesia
  • A contraindication for the use of sevoflurane
  • A known mental retardation of the child
  • Preoperative behavioral disturbances and psychiatric disorders
  • Any use of psychoactive medication
  • A known photosensitive epilepsy
  • A previous operation within 3 months of the time of scheduled operation
  • Any other contraindication for the use of the study medication
  • Previous history of multiple surgery (>3)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

150 participants in 2 patient groups

Midazolam Group
Active Comparator group
Description:
* Midazolam(Buccolam 5mg/ml) * 0.5mg/kg oral, max 12mg * one time * given 30 min prior to going to holding
Treatment:
Drug: Midazolam oral solution
IPAD group
Active Comparator group
Description:
* No premedication * IPAD when arriving at the holding * any games, movies, clips, puzzles
Treatment:
Device: IPAD

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Panagiotis Flamée, MD; Alex Van Hoorn, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems