Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
To proof patients' benefit of minimally invasive surgery in the dorsal cervical spine an apparatus to examine head-neck-coordination was constructed.
Two different surgical techniques will be compared:
Laminoplasty: open approach vs minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-approach; Foraminotomy: open approach vs MIS-approach. Each patient will be tested before surgery, postoperative as well as 3 and 12 month follow-up.
Hypothesis is that patients after MIS-approaches perform better in their head-neck-coordination as patients with open approaches.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
100 participants in 4 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ralph Kothe, MD; Alexander Gude, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal