ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

HFNC Versus Conventional Nasal Cannula in Oxygen Performance in Patients Receiving Colonoscopy Under IV Sedation

A

Aventura Hospital and Medical Center

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Desaturation of Blood

Treatments

Device: Conventional Nasal Cannula
Device: High Flow Nasal Cannula
Other: Patient satisfaction questionnaire

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02968706
2016-516

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to investigate if high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), as compared to conventional nasal cannula, improves oxygenation and prevents desaturation events in obese patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Full description

Intravenous sedation during colonoscopy has become the standard practice in United States given its higher patient satisfaction and procedural quality. The most common used short acting sedative agent is propofol. Although possessing safe and rapidly reversed pharmacokinetic properties, propofol intravenous infusion can lead to respiratory depression and hypoxemia. In one prospective study, hypoxemia events, defined by oxygen saturation less than 90 percent was found in 20 percent of patients receiving colonoscopy using propofol sedation. The mechanism of hypoxemia is mainly hypoventilation, airway collapse, and carbon dioxide (CO2) retention. When it comes to gastrointestinal procedures, using oxygen devices for augmenting ventilation is usually avoided, ex: positive pressure ventilation, since it can lead to bowel distention and affect quality of procedures. Therefore most hospitals in United States still use nasal cannula of oxygen therapy during gastrointestinal procedures, and there is lack of available options of oxygen therapy which can improve hypoventilation and prevent hypoxemia.

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a new generation of oxygen therapy. It provides constant high flow oxygen delivery with heated and humidified air. Moreover, it has been studied that high velocity of airflow can create the effect of "positive end expiratory pressure" thus assist ventilation and work of breathing. Compared to conventional nasal cannula and face mask, HFNC has demonstrated superior performance in oxygenation, work of breathing and patient comfort in many studies. Since its invention, HFNC has been studied in post-cardiac surgery, post-extubation, bronchoscopy and dental procedures and all of them show equal to better oxygen performance in comparison of nasal cannula.

While capnographic monitoring has been studied to prevent hypoxemia during sedation, no studies have been done to evaluate the clinical utility of new generation oxygen therapy. Obesity is associated with increased frequency of sedation related complications especially hypoxemia during propofol mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures. The Investigators hypothesized that HFNC may improve oxygen performance compared to conventional nasal cannula for obese patients receiving colonoscopy under intravenous sedation.

Enrollment

300 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI ≥ 30.
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • ASA classification II and III.
  • Scheduled for colonoscopy.
  • Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergic to propofol and any of its contents.
  • Baseline SpO2 less than 93%.
  • Patients who require intubation for airway protection based on anesthesiologist discretion.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

300 participants in 2 patient groups

High flow cannula arm
Experimental group
Description:
Patients in the experimental arm (the high flow nasal cannula group) will receive heated humidified high flow oxygen of 50L/min at FiO2 of 40% throughout the colonoscopy. A patient satisfaction survey will be administered after procedure.
Treatment:
Device: High Flow Nasal Cannula
Other: Patient satisfaction questionnaire
Conventional cannula arm
Active Comparator group
Description:
Participants in control arm (the conventional nasal cannula group) will receive an oxygen flow of 2-5 L /min. A patient satisfaction survey will be administered after procedure.
Treatment:
Device: Conventional Nasal Cannula
Other: Patient satisfaction questionnaire

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Hilda Mahmoudi, MD, MPH

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems