ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

HFR A-equilibrium on Cardiovascular Stability (AIMS)

A

Azienda Ospedaliera di Lecco

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Hypotension

Treatments

Device: Standard sodium dialysate
Device: Automated sodium profiling in endogenous hemodiafiltration

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT01414842
HFR-BFBCK0611 (Other Identifier)
HFR-AE-2006

Details and patient eligibility

About

Aim of the present randomized controlled multinational trial is the comparison of a novel biofeedback system on sodium profiling applied to a endogenous hemodiafiltration therapy, with the standard (no sodium profiling) hemodiafiltration technique on the intradialytic overall and cardiovascular stability.

Full description

Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has been recently associated with better patient survival in comparison with standard hemodialysis in some large observational studies (Canaud et al, KI, 2006; Vilar et al, CJASN , 2009) supporting the hypothesis that convection can improve patients outcomes. Moreover, it has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (Locatelli et al, Journal American Society of Nephrology, 2010) that OL-HDF significantly reduced the frequency of intradialytic hypotension. Nonetheless, the associated comorbidities and ageing of dialysis population require further devices able to improve treatment tolerance. Among these tools, the sodium profiling and biofeedback system seem to be promising to accomplish this task. But the correct intradialytic sodium balance is still far away today to be easily achieved. The use of an automated adaptive system dialysis to the sodium profiling has been investigated in a feasibility trial (Colì et al International Journal Artificial Organs, 2003). They also investigated the impact of such a device on treatment tolerance.

The aim of this randomized multinational multicenter controlled trial is to evaluate the impact of sodium profiling applied to a endogenous hemodiafiltration technique on the intradialytic cardiovascular stability in comparison to standard no profiled endogenous hemodiafiltration.

Enrollment

50 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with more than 30% of dialysis complicated by hypotension
  • age between 18 and 85 yers
  • time on dialysis greater than 6 months
  • residual creatinine clearance less than 2 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • native fistula or central venous catheter with blood flow rate greater than 250 ml/min

Exclusion criteria

  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • solid active neoplasm
  • pregnancy
  • major event in the previous 3 months (ictus, myocardial infarction, cachexia)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

50 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard
Active Comparator group
Description:
Standard constant (no profiled) sodium dialysate used during endogenous hemodiafiltration
Treatment:
Device: Standard sodium dialysate
Automated profiled
Experimental group
Description:
Automate sodium profiling in endogenous hemodiafiltration
Treatment:
Device: Automated sodium profiling in endogenous hemodiafiltration

Trial contacts and locations

12

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems