ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

HFS-guided Renal Ablation for Improving Outcome of Renal Denervation Procedure

M

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation

Status and phase

Unknown
Phase 2

Conditions

Hypertension

Treatments

Device: Renal denervation guided by HFS
Device: Renal denervation as standard procedure

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

NETWORK

Identifiers

NCT02608632
7452RDNHFS

Details and patient eligibility

About

To increase the number of responders using HFS-guided renal artery denervation (RDN) in patients with resistant and moderate resistant hypertension

Enrollment

170 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Office-based systolic blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg and <160/100 mm Hg (moderate resistant hypertension) or ≥160/100 mm Hg (severe resistant hypertension), despite treatment with 3 antihypertensive drugs (including a diuretic).
  • A glomerular filtration rate ≥45 mL/min/1⋅73 m2, with modification of diet using a renal disease formula.

Exclusion criteria

  • Secondary causes of hypertension
  • Severe renal artery stenosis or dual renal arteries
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <35%
  • Previous renal artery stenting or angioplasty
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

170 participants in 2 patient groups

Group 1 (RDN guided by HFS)
Experimental group
Description:
Renal arteries were assessed for suitability of ablation by renal angiography. The real-time 3-dimensional aorta-renal artery maps were reconstructed with the use of navigation system and ablation catheter via femoral artery access. After that high-frequency stimulation (HFS) was used before the initial and after each radiofrequency (RF) delivery within the renal artery. RDN was considered to have been achieved when the sudden increase of blood pressure (\> 15 mm Hg from invasive arterial monitoring) was eliminated in response to HFS. RF ablations of 8-12 watts (impedance drop \>10%) were applied discretely from the first distal main renal artery bifurcation all the way back to the ostium. The duration of each RF delivery was 60-120 sec, and up to 6 lesions (separated by \> 5 mm) were performed both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery.
Treatment:
Device: Renal denervation guided by HFS
Group 2 (RDN as standard procedure)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Renal arteries were assessed for suitability of ablation by renal angiography. The real-time 3-dimensional aorta-renal artery maps were reconstructed with the use of navigation system and ablation catheter via femoral artery access. RF ablations of 8-12 watts (impedance drop \>10%) were applied discretely from the first distal main renal artery bifurcation all the way back to the ostium. The duration of each RF delivery was 60-120 sec, and up to 6 lesions (separated by \> 5 mm) were performed both longitudinally and rotationally within each renal artery. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was performed before and after RDN to just to verify the response of BP
Treatment:
Device: Renal denervation as standard procedure

Trial contacts and locations

3

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems