Status
Conditions
About
Goal is to analyse the clinical safety and efficacy of the CARESTO® heal Stent within standard clinical routine for the treatment of patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) and with high-risk plaque features for stroke recurrence compared to medical treatment alone with respect to the mid- and long-term clinical outcomes.
Full description
The purpose of the CARESTAR study is to analyse the clinical safety and efficacy of the CARESTO® heal Stent within standard clinical routine for the treatment of patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) <50% and with high-risk plaque features for stroke recurrence compared to the medical treatment group and with respect to the mid- and long-term clinical outcomes. By randomly assigning participants to the two treatment arms, the aim is to generate bias-free and reliable data that can provide information on the optimal treatment approach in this patient group. Despite advances in medical therapy and endovascular treatment, the optimal treatment strategy for low-grade vulnerable plaques remains unclear. There is therefore an urgent need to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive procedures such as carotid stenting against medical treatment according to clinical routine in this specific patient group. With CARESTAR, a multicentre, prospective, randomised, parallel-grouped open label and blinded safety endpoint study this gap shall be closed. Given the considerations outlined above, symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) <50% with neurological symptoms represents a desperate situation, where all available options for contribution to the improvement of the patient's state of health or to the prevention of secondary diseases should be considered.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke or acute retinal artery ischemia within the last two weeks related to symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease (SyNC) and high-risk carotid plaque features
Patients with no other identifiable cause of stroke, evaluated using standard echocardiographic examinations to exclude cardiogenic or aortogenic sources of embolism
Symptomatic non-stenotic carotid disease defined as one or more plaques in the ipsilateral internal carotid artery causing 10-49% luminal narrowing AND
Presence of high-risk plaque features which must be determined through visual inspection on CTA or MRI (Ultrasound findings alone are insufficient; features must be confirmed by CTA or MRI to meet the criteria):
Presence of carotid web characterized as shelf-like/linear, smooth filling defects
Plaque assessment including evaluation of the presence of high-risk features by routine imaging (CTA, MRI) confirmed by an independent CoreLab
Signed Informed Consent Form
Patient ≥ 18 years
mRS ≤ 3 at time of randomisation
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) according to standard of care before endovascular treatment
Exclusion criteria
Patients with acute complete occlusion of the carotid artery in an emergency setting
Incidence of acute infarcts in other vascular (i.e., not ipsilateral carotid) territories
Patients in whom the stroke was likely caused by one of the following diseases:
Small vessel disease
Predominantly calcified Plaques (≥50% calcified plaque components on CT-Angio)
Patients presenting with intraluminal carotid thrombus (e.g. characterized by 'donut sign' on CTA)
Patients with highly tortuous vessels (>90°) which may prevent access or safe insertion of the stent
Patients with post-CEA re-stenosis or post-CAS re-stenosis
Patients with blood coagulation disorders
Patients in whom access to the carotid lesion is impossible or associated with an increased risk of procedural complications
Patients with lesions in the ostium of the common carotid artery
Patients with known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium
Patients who are allergic to heparin
Any known conditions that affect life expectancy to less than 12 months
Any known conditions associated with an increased risk of endovascular treatment
Patients not able to visit the outpatient clinic for annual follow-up
536 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal