ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

High Definition Versus Chromoendoscopy for Dysplasia Detection in Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

T

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Status

Completed

Conditions

Ulcerative Colitis

Treatments

Other: High definition (HD) endoscopy
Other: chromoendoscopy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02138318
GA12/10210

Details and patient eligibility

About

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population. Regular screening by colonoscopy is an internationally recommended cancer prevention strategy. Random sampling of the mucosa throughout the colon has been the mainstay of conventional surveillance practice to detect abnormalities, known as dysplasia which can progress to CRC. This requires multiple biopsies, to be taken and processed, a practice which is is tedious, expensive, time consuming and has a low pickup rate. Dysplasia in UC is typically flat and patchy and can be easily overlooked with standard conventional white light colonoscopy (WLC).

Detection can be improved by the application of dyes which highlight more subtle abnormalities. This practice, known as chromoendoscopy (CE) is better than WLC at dysplasia detection but more time consuming for the patient and cannot guarantee that the whole colon is covered. CE has only been compared in clinical trials with standard definition endoscopy rather than the recently available high definition endoscopes with better resolution and picture. High definition (HD) endoscopy uses a high definition onitor and a high resolution CCD (charge coupled device) providing much better images than standard video endoscopy. HD colonoscopy promises therefore to provide an alternative to CE in UC surveillance without the need for the extra time and experience required for dye spraying for both endoscopists and nursing staff.

The investigators plan to do a randomized trial to assess HD colonoscopy alone compared to chromoendoscopy (with HD colonoscopies) for dysplasia detection during surveillance for ulcerative colitis. There have been no trials comparing these two modalities and the investigators hope to provide evidence that the additional benefit of CE over HD colonoscopy would be marginal and therefore CE would be reserved for procedures using standard definition scopes.

Enrollment

152 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 100 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with longstanding (more than 10 years), extensive (extending proximal to the splenic flexure) colitis attending for surveillance colonoscopy.
  • Patients over 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Unwilling or unable to give informed consent
  • Severe active colitis (as assessed by the endoscopist)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

152 participants in 2 patient groups

chromoendoscopy
Other group
Treatment:
Other: chromoendoscopy
High definition (HD) endoscopy
Other group
Treatment:
Other: High definition (HD) endoscopy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems