ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

High-Dose Combination Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women With High-Risk Breast Cancer (15-95)

E

ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Treatments

Radiation: low-LET electron therapy
Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Drug: mesna
Biological: filgrastim
Radiation: low-LET photon therapy
Drug: fluorouracil
Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride
Drug: methotrexate
Drug: tamoxifen citrate
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Drug: cyclophosphamide
Drug: CMF regimen

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

NETWORK

Identifiers

NCT00002784
EU-96021
CDR0000064834
IBCSG-15-95

Details and patient eligibility

About

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard combination chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation with standard combination chemotherapy in treating women with stage II or stage III breast cancer.

Full description

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the survival, disease-free survival, and systemic disease-free survival of women with high-risk, operable stage II/III breast cancer treated with three courses of dose-intensive epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells vs. standard EC followed by cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil. II. Compare the toxicity, duration of quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity, and quality of life associated with these two treatments. III. Evaluate the cost effectiveness of these two treatments.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by estrogen receptor status and menopausal status. Within 6 weeks of surgery, patients in the first group receive epirubicin (preferred) or doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for 4 courses followed by conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) every 4 weeks for 3 courses. Patients in the second group undergo stem cell mobilization and harvest with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) followed within 10 weeks of surgery by high-dose chemotherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by peripheral blood stem cell rescue and G-CSF. All patients receive adjuvant tamoxifen, and patients who underwent lumpectomy prior to entry are required to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (radiotherapy is optional for patients who underwent mastectomy prior to entry). Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then q 6 months for 3 years, then yearly.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 210 patients will be accrued over 4 years to provide 195 evaluable patients.

Enrollment

344 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

16 to 65 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven breast carcinoma in one of the following categories: 10 or more involved axillary nodes 5 or more involved axillary nodes and either: Primary tumor estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (less than 10 femtomoles per milligram of cytosol protein) T3 tumor (regardless of ER status) Total mastectomy or breast-conserving procedure (lumpectomy or quadrantectomy) required within 6 weeks prior to randomization Tumor confined to breast and axillary nodes (T1a-c, T2, or T3, N1-2, M0 by the UICC staging system) The following conditions exclude entry: Satellite skin nodules distant from the primary tumor Supraclavicular node involvement Inoperable, matted axillary nodes Fixation of primary tumor to chest wall (excluding pectoralis major) Bilateral breast cancer (any mass in opposite breast unless biopsy-proven benign) Hot spots on bone scintigram (unless confirmed to be benign) Skeletal pain of unknown cause Hormone receptor status: ER status determination preferred, but not required

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 16-65 Sex: Women only Menopausal status: Any status Performance status: ECOG 0-2 Hematopoietic: WBC at least 4,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.1 mg/dL (20 micromoles/L) AST no greater than twice normal Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.3 mg/dL (120 micromoles/L) Cardiovascular: Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 50% by MUGA Other: No second malignancy except: Basal cell carcinoma Adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix No significant nonmalignant disease that would preclude participation No psychiatric or addictive disorder that would compromise informed consent or participation No pregnant or nursing women Adequate contraception strongly advised for fertile women

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior therapy for breast cancer other than surgery (see Disease Characteristics)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

344 participants in 2 patient groups

Standard chemotherapy
Active Comparator group
Description:
EC/AC x 4 followed by CMF x 3 and tamoxifen to 5 years after randomization.
Treatment:
Drug: cyclophosphamide
Drug: CMF regimen
Drug: epirubicin hydrochloride
Radiation: low-LET electron therapy
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Drug: fluorouracil
Drug: methotrexate
Radiation: low-LET photon therapy
Drug: tamoxifen citrate
Dose-intensive EC
Experimental group
Description:
High-dose EC x 3 supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells and tamoxifen to 5 years after randomization.
Treatment:
Drug: mesna
Drug: cyclophosphamide
Radiation: low-LET electron therapy
Procedure: peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Biological: filgrastim
Radiation: low-LET photon therapy
Drug: tamoxifen citrate

Trial contacts and locations

11

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems