Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in preventing intubation when used as primary respiratory support for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) or post extubation in preterm infants
Full description
Patient population will include preterm infants born at 24 - 36+6 weeks of gestation who are candidates for non-invasive respiratory support post extubation or as primary respiratory support after birth. They will be will be randomized to 2 groups: Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHHFNC) and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV).
This will be a prospective unblinded randomized controlled study, designed as a non-inferiority trial.
Primary outcome: The primary outcome will be rate of treatment failure (need for intubation) within 7 days of starting the study treatment
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
130 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Ayala Gover, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal