Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Background/aim: Endothelial function is closely associated with coronary artery health among individuals being treated for heart disease. An impairment in endothelial function promotes arterial stiffening that directly contributes to elevated systolic blood pressure as a result of increased vascular resistance. Inspiratory muscle training is simply a form of training consisting of repeated inspirations against resistance. Inspiratory muscle training has also been applied to patients with chronic disease or as an additional therapy for cardiac rehabilitation and it has proven to be safe in these groups. Few studies in the literature examined the effects of high-intensity inspiratory muscle training in this population, however, these studies did not examine the direct effects of inspiratory muscle training on vascular function. To the best of our knowledge, the effects of inspiratory muscle training in patients with heart disease on endothelial function and arterial stiffness prior to starting cardiac rehabilitation have not been investigated. This study aims to investigate and interpret whether high-intensity inspiratory muscle training, beyond the usual care of heart disease, improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness.
Methods: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Patients will be allocated for inspiratory muscle training (IMT) with 60% of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) or sham inspiratory muscle training (Sham-control), for 4 weeks. In both groups, before and after 4-week training, cardiovascular functions will be measured and compared.
Full description
Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both men and women in developed and developing societies (Joseph et al., 2017). Some degree of pulmonary dysfunction is highly likely in patients with heart disease compared to those without(Calles et al., 2016; Cahalin and Arena, 2015). This can affect pulmonary function, and gas exchange, as well as decrease maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP, respectively)(Dos Santos et al., 2019; Haeffener et al., 2008; Roncada et al., 2015; Cahalin and Arena, 2015).
Inspiratory muscle training has been shown to be an effective form of training that enhances lung function. It consists of repetitive breath cycles where one inspires against resistance placed by a device and expires against no resistance. Studies that have applied this form of training in patients with heart disease have found significant improvements in MIP-MEP, tidal volume, vital capacity, and 6-minute walking distance. Few studies have examined the effects of high-intensity (between 50-80% of MIP) inspiratory muscle training in patients with heart disease (Dos Santos et al., 2019; Dos Santos et al., 2021; Laoutaris et al., 2007; Miozzo et al., 2018; Sadek et al., 2022). This level of training has been associated with greater improvements in the aferomentioned outcomes of interest, however, no study has explored the effects of high-intensity inspiratory muscle training in patients with heart disease on measures of cardiovascular function.
Aim: This study aims to investigate and interpret whether high-intensity inspiratory muscle training, beyond the usual care, improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness on cardiovascular function in patients with heart disease.
Methods: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. After coronary artery bypass graft surgery, patients will be invited to the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients will be recorded after consent is obtained from the volunteer patients who meet the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, patients will be randomly divided into two groups for inspiratory muscle training (IMT) with 60% maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) or sham inspiratory muscle training (Sham-control), for 4 weeks. In both groups, before and after 4-week training, resting blood pressure (systolic/diastolic), resting heart rate, endothelial function, arterial stiffness, functional exercise capacity, the severity of dyspnea, and inspiratory muscle functions will be measured.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
11 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Cemal Ozemek, Assoc. Prof.; Ridvan Aktan, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal