ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

High-intensity Interval, Low Volume Training in Metabolic Syndrome (Intraining-MET)

U

Universidad de Antioquia

Status

Completed

Conditions

Insulin Resistance
Metabolic Syndrome

Treatments

Behavioral: CAE
Behavioral: HIIT-LV

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03087721
54-2016

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with high-intensity interval, low volume training (HIIT-LV) or continuous aerobic exercise (CAE) on insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function in adults with metabolic syndrome (MS).

The secondary objective is to compare the efficacy of an intervention with HIIT-LV or CAE on glycosylated hemoglobin, mass and muscle fibre type composition of right thigh and plasma levels of musclin and apelin in adults with MS.

The investigators hypothesized that HIIT-LV is more effective in decreasing insulin resistance and glycosylated hemoglobin and plasma concentrations of musclin and increasing plasma concentrations of apelin, and both mass and muscle fibre type I percentage in thigh, than CAE.

Full description

This study is a randomized, controlled, masked (single blind, outcomes assessor) clinical trial, with allocation by the minimization method, with two parallel groups and intention of superiority. It was designed to test the hypothesis that a 12-week program of HIIT-LV, yields larger beneficial effects on insulin resistance, skeletal muscle composition and endocrine function than CAE.

Although aerobic exercise increases cardio-respiratory capacity, modifies risk factors and decreases mortality risk, there is currently controversy and gaps in knowledge over the efficacy of more intense and low-volume physical activities on muscle metabolism in patients with metabolic disorders.

The primary outcome will be the insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity and percentage of pancreatic β-cell function. The secondary outcomes will be the glycosylated hemoglobin, mass and muscle fibre type composition of thigh and plasma levels of musclin and apelin. Assessments will be made before and after the 12-week program. Calculations based on previously results (difference mean 10% and SD 15%) suggest that a total number of 60 patients randomized 1:1 (30 in each group) to the two intervention groups is sufficient to detect larger beneficial effects with HIIT-LV with a p-value of 0.05 (two-sided test) and statistical power of 0.80 (primary endpoint is insulin sensitivity).

Enrollment

60 patients

Sex

All

Ages

40 to 60 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Metabolic syndrome defined according to the International Diabetes Federation-criteria.
  • Insulin resistance defined according to the HOMA greater than 2.25
  • Sedentary lifestyle (less than 60 min of physical activity per week)

Exclusion criteria

  • Vegetarian diet
  • Vitamin D3 supplementation
  • Oral contraceptives
  • Musculoskeletal diseases or injuries
  • Physical, sensory or cognitive impairment
  • History of cardiovascular disease (coronary, cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial disease, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias).
  • Pulmonary diseases
  • Acute or chronic inflammatory conditions
  • Cancer
  • Human immunodeficiency virus infection
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Pregnancy

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

60 participants in 2 patient groups

1x2 HIIT-LV, 3 times a week, 24 min
Experimental group
Treatment:
Behavioral: HIIT-LV
CAE, moderate intensity, 3 times a week, 36 min
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: CAE

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems