ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

High-Tech Rehabilitation Pathway for Acute Adult Neuromuscular Diseases - Fit4MedRob-Acute MND Project (Fit4MR-AcMND)

I

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Critical Illness Myopathy
Guillain Barré Syndrome
Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM)

Treatments

Other: Rehabilitation
Device: High-tech rehabilitative treatment

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06822231
2024_0053110
PNC0000007 (Other Grant/Funding Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this study is determine if a high-tech rehabilitation circuit is more effective than usual rehabilitation methods in improving functional outcome, particularly balance control, for patients with acute neuromuscolar diseases. The main question it aims to answer is:

Are high-tech rehabilitation interventions, including robotic systems, virtual reality, and stabilometric platforms, more effective than traditional rehabilitation methods in improving balance, motor function, fatigue levels, sarcopenia, cognitive engagement, and overall quality of life in patients with acute neuromuscular diseases (NMDs)? Researchers will compare a robotic treatment group, that consists in an high-tech rehabilitation, with a control group, that will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment.

Full description

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel rehabilitation protocol integrating advanced technologies in the treatment of acute neuromuscular diseases (NMDs).

Background: NMDs affect muscle function and are directly controlled by the nervous system. Traditional rehabilitation often falls short in addressing the multifaceted needs of NMD patients. This gap underscores the necessity for innovative rehabilitation approaches that can significantly enhance the quality of life and optimize recovery outcomes following acute events.

Methods: The protocol integrates advanced technologies to address the rehabilitation needs of patients with acute NMDs. It utilizes robotic systems to ensure consistent and precise movement, virtual reality for immersive and engaging therapy, and stabilometric platforms to enhance balance training. The focus is on acute NMDs such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP), either individually or in combination (CIP/CIM). The approach emphasizes rapid rehabilitation to maximize recovery outcomes.

Study Design: An interventional, randomized, superiority case-control study with a parallel assignment. The trial aims to compare the efficacy of high-tech rehabilitation methods against conventional treatments in improving patient outcomes.

Outcome Measures: To assess the improvement at least 10 points in balance measured using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the treatment period comparing the high-tech rehabilitation circuit with standard rehabilitation protocol.

Conclusion: This protocol seeks to determine if high-tech rehabilitation interventions can outperform traditional methods in acute NMDs. By doing so, it aims to potentially establish a new global standard for the care of patients with NMD care.

Enrollment

124 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 80 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with ages ranging from 18 to 80 years.
  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute/subacute neuromuscular diseases (e.g. GBS, CIM, CIP)
  • Time of onset ranging from 15 to 30 days
  • Patients with lower limb strength (Medical Research Council or MRC) >=2 in at least two of the flexor and extensor muscles of the following joints: hip, knee and ankle
  • Possibility of obtaining informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with unstable medical conditions (e.g. severe cardiovascular diseases, such as "New York Heart Association" - NYHA=4, respiratory distress not compensated by ventilation) that could interfere, in the clinician's judgment, with their ability to safely participate in the study or to perform the assessments related to the protocol.
  • Patients currently participating in other clinical trials that could interfere with this study.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

124 participants in 2 patient groups

Robotic treatment group
Active Comparator group
Description:
In this arm, patients will be divided into 3 treatment types based on their Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score at the time of randomization. Phase 1 (BBS \<= 20) involves treatment with a robotic verticalization system (ERIGO) and action observation training with a virtual reality device. Phase 2 (21 \< BBS \< 40) involves treatment with a robotic verticalization system (ERIGO), action observation training with a virtual reality device, and proprioceptive exercises on robotic platforms (e.g. GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody). Phase 3 (BBS \>= 41) involves motor and cognitive exercises using virtual reality device, proprioceptive exercises on robotic platforms (e.g. GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody), and aerobic exercises on a robotic treadmill (e.g. Walkerview Technobody).
Treatment:
Device: High-tech rehabilitative treatment
Control group
Other group
Description:
The patients will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment according to the good clinical practice according to the Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Care Pathways of each center involved
Treatment:
Other: Rehabilitation

Trial contacts and locations

8

Loading...

Central trial contact

Christian Lunetta, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems