Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
Knowledge of HIV status is a first step towards accessing HIV care, treatment, and prevention services.The GIRLS study will rigorously compare two 'seek' recruitment strategies, three 'test' strategies, and two enhancements to an adaptive (SMART trial design) 'linkage' to care intervention, among young at-risk women, 15-24 years old, in Homa Bay County, western Kenya. Additionally, we will evaluate a scalable primary prevention messaging intervention to support identified HIV-negative young women in reducing HIV risk and adhering to recommended HIV re-testing recommendations. We will also conduct an economic evaluation, using cost effectiveness analyses to determine the relative utility of each seek, test, link, and prevention interventions.
Lessons learned will inform Government of Kenya, and other key policymakers, implementing partners and agencies throughout sub-Saharan Africa that are exploring policies about appropriate scale up of these multiple seek, test, link, retain, and prevention strategies to realize the dream of an AIDS-free future for adolescent girls and young women.
Full description
The GIRLS study will inform best practices to increase adolescent girls and young women's uptake of HIV prevention, testing, and linkage for HIV to care services in a high-HIV burden African setting to optimize engagement in both the HIV prevention and care continua.
Aim 1: To determine the preferred recruitment venue and testing modality that targets and finds the highest number of HIV infected and at risk female youth aged 15-24 years in Homa Bay County, Nyanza region, western Kenya.
Aim 2: (a) To pilot and evaluate an adaptive intervention to link newly diagnosed HIV-positive female youth to treatment and care services; and (b) To identify barriers and facilitators to seeking HIV care services after receiving a positive diagnosis; (c) To identify barriers and facilitators to seeking HIV prevention services for high risk female youth after receiving a negative HIV test result; (d) To provide an HIV prevention intervention to a randomly selected subset of high risk negatives, and to re-test them; and
Aim 3: To conduct an economic evaluation, using cost effectiveness analyses to determine the relative utility of each seek, test, link, and prevention intervention.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
1,198 participants in 6 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal