ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Hip Abduction and Adduction During Neurodynamic Stretching (HIPROT)

U

University of Burgundy

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Control Condition
Stretching

Treatments

Other: Maximal neurodynamic flossing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07350434
CEP2601

Details and patient eligibility

About

Neurodynamic mobilization techniques are widely applied in rehabilitation and physiotherapy to enhance the mobility and function of peripheral nerves. Two main approaches are distinguished : Nerve tensioning and nerve flossing. They both involve proximal and distal joint movements to induce greater neural sliding while avoiding excessive tensile stress. However, contradictory findings following neurodynamic stretching highlighted the current lack of consensus regarding the position that should be used. Moreover, neurodynamic techniques are of interest for patients, it appeared it could also be applied in healthy individuals and more particularly in athletes. Accordingly, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the immediate effect of two hip positions (adduction vs. abduction) during neurodynamic flossing techniques on the sciatic nerve and hamstring tissues using the shear wave elastography (SWE, a form of ultrasonography).

Full description

Neurodynamic mobilization techniques are frequently applied in rehabilitation settings to enhance the mobility and function of peripheral nerves, particularly in the management of neuropathic pain such as carpal tunnel syndrome, radiculopathies, or sciatica. Two main approaches are distinguished. Nerve tensioning involves maintaining the nerve stretched at the end of the joint range of motion with relatively limited excursion. It is similar to a static stretching intervention but with distal (ankle) and proximal (cervical) tensions. Nerve flossing (also termed gliding or sliders), consists of alternating proximal and distal joint movements to induce greater neural sliding while avoiding excessive tensile stress. Both techniques appear efficient. However, contradictory findings following neurodynamic stretching highlighted the current lack of consensus regarding the angular position that could be used. For instance, hip rotations or hip adduction could impact muscle or nerve tissue changes, particularly in healthy tissues. Moreover, neurodynamic techniques are of interest for patients, it appeared it could also be applied in healthy individuals and more particularly in athletes. Performed in patients, healthy or athletes, no study has compared different hip positions. Accordingly, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the immediate effect of two hip positions (adduction vs. abduction) during neurodynamic flossing techniques on the sciatic nerve and hamstring tissues using the shear wave elastography (SWE, a form of ultrasonography). This method has been shown reliable to provide non-invasive real-time assessments of soft tissues elastic properties.

Enrollment

12 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy
  • physical active
  • no injuries (lower limb or back pain) in the past 3 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Specific lower limb (hamstring) injuries in the past 2 years
  • Not restraining activity 24h before participation

Trial design

Primary purpose

Other

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

12 participants in 6 patient groups

No intervention (neutral)
No Intervention group
Description:
No intervention with measurements in neutral position
No intervention (adduction)
No Intervention group
Description:
No intervention with measurements in adduction position
No intervention (abduction)
No Intervention group
Description:
No intervention with measurements in abduction position
Neurodynamic (neutral)
Active Comparator group
Description:
The hip was positioned neutral (alignment between the lower limb and the trunk).
Treatment:
Other: Maximal neurodynamic flossing
Neurodynamic (adduction)
Experimental group
Description:
The hip was positioned in adduction and the neurodynamic stretch was applied.
Treatment:
Other: Maximal neurodynamic flossing
Neurodynamic (abduction)
Experimental group
Description:
The hip was positioned in abduction and the neurodynamic stretch was applied.
Treatment:
Other: Maximal neurodynamic flossing

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Nicolas Babault; Carole Cometti

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems