ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

His-pacing and AV-node Ablation vs. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation (His-PAAF)

R

Region Skane

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation
Left Atrial Dilatation

Treatments

Procedure: Conduction System pacing and AV node ablation
Procedure: Atrial fibrillation ablation by pulmonary vein isolation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04512586
His_PAAF_study

Details and patient eligibility

About

Objective To investigate if conduction system pacing ((CSP) i.e. atrioventricular node ablation + His bundle pacing or Left Bundle Branch pacing) is as good as (or better than) atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation for older patients (70-85yrs) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and at least moderately dilated left atrium.

Patient population:

90 patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation, referred to either AV node ablation or pulmonary vein isolation.

Primary endpoint:

Improvement in health-related quality of life as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the well-validated SF-36 form, at one year after AV node ablation + CSP or AF ablation.

Secondary endpoints:

Physical performance measured by 6-minute walk test, biochemical markers of heart failure (NT-ProBNP), frequency of complications, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and left atrial size evaluated after 12 months. Arrhythmia specific symptoms and anxiety will be measured with the ASTA and HADS questionnaires. Arrhythmia symptom correlation between subjective and objective findings. After three years, clinical endpoints will be evaluated regarding overall survival, and risk of heart failure hospitalization or death. The cost of the treatments will be compared, and estimated cost per quality adjusted year of life will be calculated, based on the EQ5D questionnaire.

Enrollment

45 patients

Sex

All

Ages

70 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Indication for invasive treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation according to current guidelines
  • LVEF >35%
  • Age 70-85 years
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with at least moderate enlargement of the left atrium (≥42ml/m2)
  • Chronic and well-tolerated treatment with anticoagulants (either non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist)
  • Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Chronic atrial fibrillation with >1 year duration
  • BMI >40kg/m2
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Severe heart failure with symptoms ≥ NYHA class IIIb
  • Heart amyloidosis
  • Cardiac sarcoidosis
  • Recent (<3 months) myocardial infarction
  • Significant heart valve disease (pronounced insufficiency or stenosis)
  • Pacemaker or ICD treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication
  • Congenital heart disease that required surgical correction
  • Comorbidity that is assessed significantly affect the patient's quality of life over the next year, or 3-year survival

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

45 participants in 2 patient groups

Conduction System pacing plus AV node ablation
Experimental group
Description:
A His-pacing lead in combination with a backup RV pacing lead or an LBB pacing lead, and a right atrial lead (if needed) will be placed using standard technique. The His-pacing or LBB pacing lead will be Medtronic 3830, and the outer sheath will be either Medtronic C304 or C315 deflectable. If failure to implant with these tools, other leads and sheaths can be used at the discretion of the operator. A standard DDD pacemaker or CRT-P device from Medtronic will be used. A minimum of three weeks post-implant, the device will be interrogated and His-bundle threshold will be evaluated. A threshold of ≤2.0V@1.0ms is acceptable. If the device is well-functioning and successful His-pacing is documented, AV node ablation will be performed.
Treatment:
Procedure: Conduction System pacing and AV node ablation
Pulmonary vein isolation
Active Comparator group
Description:
Atrial fibrillation will be performed as a complete pulmonary vein isolation. Either Cryoballon or radio frequency ablation with irrigated tip contact force enabled catheter can be used. Pulsed field ablation can be used if available. Endpoint is complete electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins, verified by entry- and exit block using a multipolar catheter during pacing.
Treatment:
Procedure: Atrial fibrillation ablation by pulmonary vein isolation

Trial contacts and locations

4

Loading...

Central trial contact

Cecilia Rorsman, MD; Rasmus Borgquist, MD PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems