ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

HIV Screening Take-up: Evaluating Incentives and Opt-out Strategies

University of California San Francisco (UCSF) logo

University of California San Francisco (UCSF)

Status

Completed

Conditions

HIV

Treatments

Behavioral: HIV Test Offering
Behavioral: Questionnaire Timing
Behavioral: Monetary Incentive

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT01377857
10562983
1RC4AG039078-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Over twenty percent of HIV-positive persons in the United States are unaware of their infection, leading the Institute of Medicine to recently urge further work to compare the effectiveness of HIV screening strategies. This study will use a randomized trial to compare several variants of emergency-room-based HIV-testing policies in order to determine how HIV test acceptance rates can be increased. The testing policies will be designed using principles from behavioral economics, varying the choice architecture and offering small monetary incentives. This will be the first study to measure differences in take-up rates across a variety of promising but largely untested approaches within a unified randomized trial. Three defaults will be tested: traditional opt-in (test only those patients who request testing), opt-out (routinely testing unless patients decline), and active-choice testing (patients are required to state whether they want to be tested). The study will also be the first to test the effect of small monetary incentives ($1, $5, $10) on test take-up. An additional novel study contribution will be to test the hypothesis that compliance with large requests (accept an HIV test) increases after making a small request or pre-commitment - this "foot in the door" technique has not been previously studied in this setting. The factorial design will permit a direct comparison of all interventions, as well as interactions. The study will contribute a nuanced empirical understanding of how testing protocols from behavioral economics theory affect the effectiveness and efficiency of screening programs in an actual scaled- up setting (San Francisco General Hospital). This will assist in implementing and assessing recent CDC guidelines on HIV screening, while also more generally advancing scientific knowledge related to applying behavioral economics in comparative effectiveness research.

Enrollment

8,572 patients

Sex

All

Ages

13 to 64 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 13 - 64 years who are awake, alert, not intoxicated, and understand the premise of the test will be offered the test and questionnaire according to their treatment group.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have altered levels of consciousness, are critically ill (e.g., serious trauma), are known to have preexisting HIV diagnosis, or who have been tested for HIV in the past 3 months will be excluded from the study.
  • Pregnant patients will be excluded due to alternative guidelines for incorporating opt-out testing during prenatal care.
  • Any patients who are in police custody will also be excluded due to their lack of control over study participation decisions and ethical concerns over possible coercion.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Screening

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

8,572 participants in 10 patient groups

Opt-In
Experimental group
Description:
Opt-in refers to a default of no test - patients must ask for the test in order to receive it. Patients are informed of the availability of rapid testing. They are tested only if they request the test.
Treatment:
Behavioral: HIV Test Offering
Opt-Out
Experimental group
Description:
Opt-out has a default to test - patients are informed that they will receive a rapid HIV screening test unless they decline it. Patients will be tested unless they decline.
Treatment:
Behavioral: HIV Test Offering
Active Choice
Experimental group
Description:
In the active choice treatment, there is no default; patients must actively accept or actively decline the test.
Treatment:
Behavioral: HIV Test Offering
$1 Incentive
Experimental group
Description:
When offering the HIV test, study staff will inform subjects that the ED is offering cash incentives to promote HIV testing (and that the test is also free), and will inform them of that day's value.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Monetary Incentive
$5 Incentive
Experimental group
Description:
When offering the HIV test, study staff will inform subjects that the ED is offering cash incentives to promote HIV testing (and that the test is also free), and will inform them of that day's value.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Monetary Incentive
$10 Incentive
Experimental group
Description:
When offering the HIV test, study staff will inform subjects that the ED is offering cash incentives to promote HIV testing (and that the test is also free), and will inform them of that day's value.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Monetary Incentive
Early Questionnaire
Experimental group
Description:
At a time that does not interfere with patients' medical care, patients will be approached by a member of the research team to consent to and complete a short (3 minutes) questionnaire. The questionnaire is designed to elicit two things: subjective risk of infection (e.g., What are the chances you have HIV? \[Not possible, Unlikely, Possible, Likely, Certain\]) and objective risk of infection (e.g., In the past year, have you given anyone drugs or money for sex?). The questionnaire will be administered as one of two timing treatments - a) at the beginning of care, before the patient is offered an HIV test (Early questionnaire) or b) after the patient has been offered an HIV test (Late questionnaire).
Treatment:
Behavioral: Questionnaire Timing
Late Questionnaire
Experimental group
Description:
At a time that does not interfere with patients' medical care, patients will be approached by a member of the research team to consent to and complete a short (3 minutes) questionnaire. The questionnaire is designed to elicit two things: subjective risk of infection (e.g., What are the chances you have HIV? \[Not possible, Unlikely, Possible, Likely, Certain\]) and objective risk of infection (e.g., In the past year, have you given anyone drugs or money for sex?). The questionnaire will be administered as one of two timing treatments - a) at the beginning of care, before the patient is offered an HIV test (Early questionnaire) or b) after the patient has been offered an HIV test (Late questionnaire).
Treatment:
Behavioral: Questionnaire Timing
FITD Questionnaire
Experimental group
Description:
There will be two versions of the early questionnaire: one standard Early questionnaire, and one with an additional question: "If you were offered an HIV test as part of your routine health care at no cost, would you get tested?" The two questionnaires will be otherwise identical.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Questionnaire Timing
Free
Experimental group
Description:
When offering the HIV test, study staff will inform subjects that the ED is offering HIV testing (and that the test is also free); no monetary incentive will be offered.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Monetary Incentive

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems