ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Honey As a Wound Care Modality in Treating Deep Neck Space Abscess

G

Gadjah Mada University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Neck Abscess

Treatments

Other: Honey
Other: PHMB Solution

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06562257
KE/FK/0668/EC/2024

Details and patient eligibility

About

This study investigates the effectiveness of honey as a treatment for deep neck space abscesses, comparing it to standard wound care methods. Conducted as a randomized clinical trial, it aims to determine whether honey can offer a viable alternative or improvement in managing this condition. The research assesses outcomes related to healing, infection control, and overall patient recovery.

Full description

Deep neck abscess is one of the diseases in the field of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery that has high morbidity, mortality, and costs. Management of deep neck abscesses involves incision and drainage, abscess exploration, systemic administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, management of comorbid factors, and postoperative wound care until healing. Standard dressing for wound care has been time-consuming and costly. Honey is one type of dressing modality that has been widely used in wound care for various parts of the body and diseases. Honey is expected to be a more cost-efficient treatment modality that supports accelerated wound healing, leading to better outcomes and cost savings.

The research design used is a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), where researchers randomly assign one intervention to respondents to compare the effects of honey and Prontosan on the wound healing process. The population and sample of the study include all patients with deep neck abscesses treated at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, the teaching hospital of the Faculty of Medicine Gadjah Mada University and other hospitals equipped with board-certified Otorhinolaryngologists. The participants in the control group were treated with standard dressing, while participants in the study group were treated with standard dressing along with honey dressing.

Enrollment

36 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Deep neck abscess patients over 18 years old with or without comorbidities except for malignant diseases

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who refused intervention
  • Patients who underwent vacuum-assisted closure (VAC)
  • Patients with incomplete medical records

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

36 participants in 2 patient groups

Treatment Group (Standard Dressing and Honey)
Experimental group
Description:
In the treatment group, we combined standard procedures with the application of Nusantara Honey. A 120 cm gauze roll was soaked in a bowl containing 12 cc of Nusantara Honey for precisely 1 minute until saturation. Once the wound bed had risen sufficiently, the honey-soaked gauze was applied and covered with sterile gauze.
Treatment:
Other: PHMB Solution
Other: Honey
Control Group (Standard Dressing)
Active Comparator group
Description:
The control group adhered to the established standard operating procedure (SOP) at the Larynx Pharynx subdivision of Dr. Sardjito Hospital. This protocol involved several steps of wound debridement, saline irrigation, gauze roll application, and Prontosan administration.
Treatment:
Other: PHMB Solution

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Dian Paramita Wulandari

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems