Identification of the Pericardiophrenic Vein During Cardiac Device Implant Procedures to Prevent Extracardiac Stimulation (IDPV-003)

Respicardia

Status

Completed

Conditions

Heart Failure

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT01008670

CCI-Venography

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary goal of this study is to develop techniques to identify the course of the phrenic nerve in patients already undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation or candidates for future CRT devices undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation. Specifically, the study intends to identify the location and course of the left pericardiophrenic vein, and thus the left phrenic nerve, to guide the location for coronary vein lead placement and minimize the risk of phrenic nerve stimulation.

Full description

Phrenic nerve stimulation from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a common adverse event occurring in 1.5-3% of patients and sometimes as high as 10%. Phrenic nerve stimulation is frequently observed during the implantation procedure but often appears shortly after implantation as well. Clinically, dyspnea, cough, and hiccups can occur, some of which are uncomfortable and not tolerated by the patient for very long periods of time. Resolution of these clinical outcomes requires repositioning the left coronary vein lead in a second procedure with its attendant serious clinical sequelae. As CRT leads become smaller the incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation is likely to increase.

The risk of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) exists during CRT implantation and is only minimally dependent of the type of coronary lead and highly dependent upon location of the left coronary vein lead in relationship to the left phrenic nerve and stimulation strength. Tedrow et al. demonstrated in a cohort of 71 patients PNS can reach 16% if stimulation strength is increased to maximize mechanical benefit of CRT. No current methods have been able to predict PNS, the one likely method of preventing PNS is to identify the location of the phrenic nerve in the specific patient, as confirmed by visualization and ability to stimulate the phrenic nerve and by maximizing the distance between the coronary vein lead position and nerve.

In order to reduce the incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation, Vaseghi performed non-selective injections of contrast media and was able to identify the left pericardiophrenic vein in only about 12% of patients undergoing biventricular pacemaker placement. However, in these patients, identification of the left pericardiophrenic vein provides a landmark for positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead that totally eliminated the incidence of phrenic nerve pacing.

The relationship of cardiac structures to the right and left phrenic nerves is generally known but is significantly variable between patients. There is no imaging or other clinically available modality that allows the physician to identify the location of the left phrenic nerve and attempt to avoid it during the left coronary vein lead implant procedure.

The pericardiophrenic veins are a deep collateral venous drainage of the pericardium, pleura and diaphragm and lie adjacent the phrenic nerves on both the right and left sides between the parietal pericardium and adjacent pleura. The ostium of the left pericardiophrenic vein is usually in the left brachiocephalic vein opposite the entrance of the left jugular vein. The left phrenic vein is located in the general vicinity of the thymic veins which often have multiple ostia in close proximity. There are several case reports in the literature of inadvertent cannulation of the pericardiophrenic veins with Swan-Ganz catheters, central venous catheters and one report of cannulation with a pacing lead leading to inadvertent phrenic nerve pacing.

Enrollment

120 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 85 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria