ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Identifying Ideal Reimbursement "Dose" to Reduce Clinical Trial-related Financial Toxicity

The University of Alabama at Birmingham logo

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Status

Completed

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Treatments

Behavioral: Reimbursement

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05871125
0
IRB-300009554
P30CA013148 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to identify the recommended financial reimbursement amount for women with breast cancer enrolled in a clinical trial. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. What is the recommended financial reimbursement amount in trial-enrolled women with breast cancer experiencing financial toxicity?
  2. What do patients think about receiving a reimbursement for trial-incurred expenses?

Participants will receive a monthly reimbursement to compensate for their trial-incurred expenses in cohorts, which will de-escalate for the next participant cohort if patients find the reimbursement dose suitable (negative financial toxicity screen, reimbursement dose deemed acceptable/appropriate). Researchers will also use qualitative interviews to explore patient perceptions of the trial reimbursements.

Full description

Our overall objective is to innovatively use a dose-finding approach to identify the recommended reimbursement amount for women with breast cancer enrolled in a clinical trial. We hypothesize that optimal reimbursement for trial-related expenses will decrease patient financial toxicity and increase trial retention. The rationale is that understanding the impact of reimbursement for trial-related costs will aid in addressing socioeconomic barriers to trial participation, thus allowing for more diversity in trial enrollment and ensuring equitable efficacy of cancer treatments when used in real-world clinical settings.

Aim 1. Identify the recommended reimbursement amount in trial-enrolled women with breast cancer experiencing financial toxicity. We propose a pilot reimbursement dose de-escalation trial (continual reassessment method design; N=30) testing a monthly reimbursement for trial-enrolled patients who screen positive for financial toxicity. We will oversample patients who are Black (50%) or residing in rural locations (50%). Monthly patient-reported financial toxicity and reimbursement acceptability and appropriateness will be captured. Reimbursement dose will start at $1000 and de-escalate if patients find the reimbursement dose suitable (negative financial toxicity screen, reimbursement dose deemed acceptable/appropriate).

Aim 2. Explore patient perceptions of trial reimbursement amounts. Using semi-structured interviews, we will explore the effects of reimbursement on specific covered and uncovered trial-related costs, financial toxicity, and current retention and future participation in clinical trials.

Enrollment

33 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants will be women with breast cancer currently enrolled in the Investigation of Serial studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular AnaLysis (I-SPY TRIAL 2) at the UAB Medical Oncology Clinic.

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-English speakers
  • Males
  • Females without cancer
  • Female cancer patients not enrolled in the I-SPY TRIAL 2

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

N/A

Interventional model

Single Group Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

33 participants in 1 patient group

Patients receiving reimbursement
Experimental group
Description:
Monthly reimbursement to offset trial-related expenses
Treatment:
Behavioral: Reimbursement

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Courtney Williams, DrPH; Stacey Ingram, MEd

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems