Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to determine whether intramuscular olanzapine is safer (fewer adverse events) and more effective (shorter time to sedation) than conventional haloperidol or midazolam when used in the management of acute agitation in the emergency department.
Full description
To address significant knowledge gaps by several means:
Investigate intramuscular use of sedative drugs within a predominantly Chinese population, to address this void in international literature impacting the management of acute agitation.
The multi-centre RCT will determine the safety and efficacy of intramuscular olanzapine, in comparison with conventional medicines (haloperidol or midazolam) in a three-arm comparison for the sedation of acutely agitated patients in emergency department. Specifically, we aim to determine if administration of intramuscular olanzapine (a)is more effective than sedation with intramuscular haloperidol or intramuscular midazolam alone; (b)is safer than sedation with comparison arms; (c)decreases the amount of subsequent redosing or alternative drugs required; (d)is more favourable than the haloperidol and midazolam arms with respect to safety, efficacy and adverse events.
Investigate potential variables leading to emergency attendance and/or admission requiring parenteral sedation. These may include patient demographics and regular medications and adherence.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be excluded if there are
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
167 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal