Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Statement of the problem: Immediate implant placement is faced with several problems. One of the most important is the jumping gap present after implant placement and whether it needs to be augmented or not.
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of xenograft to xenograft mixed with HAM gel for grafting of the jumping gap in immediate implant placement in the molar region.
Full description
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of xenograft to xenograft mixed with HAM gel for grafting of the jumping gap in immediate implant placement in the molar region.
Materials and Methods: This parallel arm, randomized controlled clinical trial will involve systemically free patients with remaining roots or badly decayed teeth in the posterior region requiring implant placement. They will be randomly allocated to two equal groups. Group A (control group, n=12) will receive immediate implants (grafting with xenograft), and group B (test group, n=12) will receive immediate implants (grafting with xenograft& HAM). After implant placement, buccal bone thickness (1ry outcome), bone density (2nd outcome) and implant stability will be assessed (2nd outcome). The parameters will be assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Postoperative pain and swelling will be recorded daily by the patient for the 1st two weeks post surgically. Postoperative medication will be prescribed to the patient and postoperative instructions will be explained in detail. Follow-up will be performed to assess the parameters and to ensure performing proper oral hygiene. Data collected will be tabulated and statistically analyzed.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
24 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal