Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to test the comparative efficacy of two surgical approaches (immediate versus delayed GBR) for the surgical reconstruction of peri-implantitis intra-bony defects in terms of the clinical, radiographical, histological, volumetric, microbiological, and patient-reported outcomes.
The investigators hypothesize that in certain clinical situations, treatment of peri-implantitis intra-bony defects with the use of a compound bone grafting material (mixture of allogenic bone substitutes) and a non-resorbable barrier membrane and following a delayed approach (test group) with initial phase of defect decontamination and initial healing phase would yield superior outcomes to that of the conventional approach (control group) of defect decontamination and regeneration at the same clinical visit while also significantly enhancing patient-reported outcomes:
H0: There is no difference between the two mentioned approaches in terms of the treatment outcomes. H1: There is a significant difference, favoring the delayed approach compared to the immediate reconstruction.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
No implant mobility and no evidence of occlusal overload. In patients presenting with more than one implant meeting the inclusion criteria, a single implant will be randomly selected for inclusion in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
40 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Purnima Kumar, DDS, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal