Impact of Adding Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization to Mulligan Therapy in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache (CGH)

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Not yet enrolling

Conditions: Cervicogenic Headache

Treatments: Other: postural correction exercises; Other: mulligan therapy; Other: instrumeted assissted soft tissue mobilization and mulligan therapy

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07373912

P.T.REC/012/006193

Details and patient eligibility

About

this study will be conducted to investigate the impact of adding Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization technique to mulligan therapy in patients with cervicogenic headache

Full description

Cervicogenic headache (CGH) has seen a notable rise in prevalence in recent years, substantially impairing patients' daily functioning and occupational productivity. Despite its considerable burden, CGH remains frequently underdiagnosed and inadequately managed, often progressing to a chronic state that heightens the risk of work absenteeism and long-term disability and as the most common type of pain disorders, affecting 66% of the global population, represent a major public health concern due to their detrimental impact on quality of life and economic productivity . Epidemiological data indicate that CGH affects 4.1% of the general population, with prevalence escalating to 17.5% among individuals with severe headaches.Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization using Graston (GT®) tool is regarded as one the most advanced and promising methods ,utilizing a specially designed instrument to adress a variety of soft tissue pathologies such as myofascial adhesions , scar tissue restriction , tissue thickenings, ridges, fibrotic nodules, crystalline deposits . this technique works by generating a mobilizing effect ,which contributes to pain reduction ,enhanced range of motion and improved overall function.The Mulligan manual technique is considered one of the most effective forms of manipulations. In contrast to conventional mobilization, which depends entirely on the therapist, Mulligan proposed that applying pressure to the spinous processes while the patient is in a weight-bearing position would cause the facet joints to glide in a coordinated ,parallel direction . simultaneously ,this approach involve the patient's active participation during movemwnt in order to achieve the perfect therapeutic outcomes

Enrollment: 60 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 70 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

-Unilateral CGH presentation

• Age group above 18 years' old
• History of chronic CGH (>3 months)
• CGH owing to cervical spine (neck) dysfunction
• Reduced cervical motion
• Neck stiffness and movement restriction

Exclusion criteria

• Participants with other types of headache (migraine headache)
• Headache owing to other causes (sinus, tumor, neural, and tempero-mandibular joint issues)
• Any contraindications to manual and manipulative therapy (fracture, instability, osteoporosis and neural symptoms)
• Taking analgesics or corticosteroids and migraine-specific medications, such as triptans
• Metastasis
• Cardiac conditions (stroke and syncope)
• Neurological conditions (radiculopathy, myelopathy)

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

60 participants in 3 patient groups

instrumeted assissted soft tissue mobilization and mulligan therapy

Experimental group

Description:

twenty patients will receive IASTM, mulligan therapy and postural correction exercises three times per week for 6 weeks.

Treatment:

Other: instrumeted assissted soft tissue mobilization and mulligan therapy

Other: mulligan therapy

Other: postural correction exercises

mulligan therapy

Experimental group

Description:

Twenty patients will receive Mulligan therapy and postural correction exercises three times per week for 6 weeks.

Treatment:

Other: mulligan therapy

Other: postural correction exercises

postural correction exercises

Active Comparator group

Description:

Twenty patients will receive postural correction exercises three times per week for 6 weeks.

Treatment:

Other: postural correction exercises