Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The purpose of this research study is to determine if taking a birth control pill effects how well an emergency contraceptive pill called Ulipristal acetate (UPA) works. This type of emergency contraceptive is the most effective oral method available. However, this medication is an anti-progestin and most regular forms of birth control contain progestin (a female hormone). It is unknown if taking the two close together may make the emergency contraceptive not work well. The overall goal of this research is to improve the effectiveness of contraception for women and to better counsel women.
Full description
Emergency contraception (EC) provides women with an additional line of defense against unintended pregnancy during an act of unprotected intercourse. An antiprogestin, ulipristal acetate (UPA; ellaTM), has emerged as one of the most effective oral options. However, there is currently a lack of information regarding the practical use of UPA. Basic science studies have shown that UPA binds to and prevents progesterone receptor from working, leading to the possible concern that hormonal contraceptives, like the birth control pill, would prevent UPA from working. Ideally, women should start their regular method of birth control soon after EC use but by doing this, they may prevent the UPA EC from working. A woman could just delay starting her regular method of birth control but then she is still at risk for pregnancy.
This proposal has been designed to address this gap in knowledge and will focus on the impact of the birth control pill on UPA's ability to delay ovulation (or the release of an egg). Subjects will undergo a referent cycle UPA only (Cycle 1, 1 month), followed by a washout cycle (Cycle 2, 1 month) and finally UPA with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) dosed 2 days later (Cycle 3, 1 month treatment cycle). The hypothesis is that starting the birth control pill shortly after UPA adversely impacts UPA's ability to delay ovulation.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
36 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal