ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Impact of Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy and Cine-angiography on Reducing Operator and Patient Dose

University Health Network, Toronto logo

University Health Network, Toronto

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Unstable Angina
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Stable Angina

Treatments

Radiation: Low Cine
Radiation: Radiation: 15 FPS Cine 15 PPS
Radiation: Radiation: 7.5 low Frame rate

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02574949
15-8832-AE

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators sought to investigate the efficacy of low frame rate (fluoroscopy at 7.5 frames per second (FPS) and Cine at 10 pulse per second (PPS) vs. conventional (15 FPS and 15 PPS) on radiation dose to the patient and the operator during coronary angiography and intervention. In addition, investigators sought to qualitatively assess the effect, if any, of the low frame rate on angiographic image quality.

Full description

Minimizing radiation exposure to patient and the operator is considered one of the primary safety concerns in the catheterization laboratory. Patients undergoing diagnostic angiography +/- ad hoc PCI or planned PCI, will be randomised to conventional settings (15 FPS and 15 PPS) or low frame rate settings (7.5 FPS and 15 PPS) or low Cine settings (7.5 FPS and 10 PPS). The patient radiation dose, patient radiation dose area product (DAP), and fluoroscopy time will be measured.

Statistical Analysis:

Demographic and procedural variables will be presented as percentage (categorical variable) or mean ± SD (continuous variable). Patients will be randomized into three arms - a control arm and two intervention arms. The angiographic radiation protocol will adhere to standard practice in both fluoroscopy and cine images at 15 frames/second. The intervention arm will consist of two groups. Group 1 with fluoroscopy images set at 7.5 frames/second and cine images set at 15 frames/second and group 2 with fluoroscopy set at 7.5 frames/second and cine set at 10 frames/second.

Sample size calculations are based on assuming a reduction in radiation dose in group 1 of 10% and in group 2 of 20%. At 5% significance and 80% power, a sample size of 200 patients will be required in each intervention arm. Allowing for a 10% attrition rate, a sample size of 220 patients will be required in each intervention arm with 100 patients in the control arm.

Enrollment

600 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing elective or urgent cardiac catheterisation with or without ad-hoc PCI or planned PCI in the pre-specified catheterisation laboratories.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who undergo procedures other than diagnostic coronary angiography or intervention (e.g. electrophysiological procedures).
  • Patients participating in other research study requiring higher cine angiography.
  • ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

600 participants in 3 patient groups

Conventional rate fluoroscopy
Active Comparator group
Description:
Radiation: 15 FPS Cine 15 PPS
Treatment:
Radiation: Radiation: 15 FPS Cine 15 PPS
Intermediate frame rate 7.5 fps
Experimental group
Description:
Radiation: 7.5 low Frame rate
Treatment:
Radiation: Radiation: 7.5 low Frame rate
Low frame rate
Experimental group
Description:
Low Cine 10 PPS
Treatment:
Radiation: Low Cine

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Ashish H Shah, MD, MD(Res); Divyesh Sharma, MSc,MRCP

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems