Impact of Magnetic Resonance and Biomarkers for Screening for Prostate Cancer. Cost-effectiveness Analysis (RMPBX201801)

InvestigatorUrologyIBSAL

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Establish the Possible Relationship Between the Expression Profiles of the microRNAs

Establish if There Are Differences Between Transrectal and Transperineal Prostatic Biopsy Schemes in Both Cases With and Without MRI

Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of Morbidity Associated With the Technique

Establish the Possible Interaction Between Biomarkers and Resonance in Different Prostate Biopsy Models to Define Tumor Presence and / or Tumor Aggressiveness

Establish the Association of the Tumor Biomarker in the Early Detection and Aggressiveness of Tumors

Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of the Patient's Subjective Perception Regarding Pain and Quality of Life

Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of the Aggressiveness of the Tumors According to the Gleason Classification

Treatments

Procedure: Multiparametric magnetic resonance

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT04283032

PI18/01560

Details and patient eligibility

About

Objectives: To establish if there are differences between an ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy (BPTE) and a transperineal prostatic biopsy (BPTP) with and without a multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (RMmp) in patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PC) to first prostatic biopsy in terms of:

Rate of detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Aggressiveness of the detected tumors.
Association of the marker [-2] proPSA and the prostate cancer health index (PHI) and microRNAs for the diagnosis of tumors.
Adverse effects of the intervention and subjective perception of the patient: pain and degree of satisfaction, and impairment of quality of life.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the different intervention options.

Study Design: Randomized, single-blind prospective clinical study to compare four schemes: RMmp + BPTE vs. BPTE 12 cylinders vs RMmp + BPTP vs BPTP 12 cylinders.

Study population: Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer with PSA between 3-20 ng / mL and normal or abnormal rectal examination, candidates for a first prostate biopsy.

Research techniques: BPTE standard of 12 cylinders compared to RMmp previous to BPTE vs BPTP of 12 cylinders compared to BPTP with previous RMmp.

Enrollment

628 estimated patients

Sex

Male

Ages

45 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Signature of informed consent prior to performing any of the specific procedures of the study
Age between 50 * - 75 years (* 45 years, if family history)
Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
Indication of a first biopsy during the study period.
Life expectancy greater than 10 years.

Exclusion criteria

Patients previously randomized in the present study.
Patients submitted prior to a prostate biopsy.
Patients with a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer and / or previous prostate surgery.
Patients with a previous episode of acute prostatitis of infectious origin in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study.
Patients with an active urinary tract infection and / or any previous pathology of severity in the 3 months prior to inclusion.
Impossibility of performing transrectal or transperineal biopsy and / or magnetic resonance.
Patients who have received hormonal treatment prior to androgen blockade in the 6 months prior to inclusion in the study.
History of other tumors.