Status
Conditions
About
In prostate cancer, whether in advanced or localized cases, hormone therapy is a key treatment. These treatments reduce male hormone levels to slow cancer growth.
More recently, a new class of drugs called Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs) has been introduced. These drugs are used alongside standard hormone therapy and are now given to both advanced and high-risk localized prostate cancer patients.
There are two main types of ARSIs: abiraterone acetate, which blocks androgen production, and enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, which prevent cancer cells from using androgens. Doctors choose between these treatments based on patient needs, as no single drug has been proven superior. These therapies have significantly improved patient survival.
However, studies show that 30% of prostate cancer patients die from heart-related problems, a higher rate than in the general population. It is important to understand the link between these treatments and heart risks.
One study found that all ARSIs increase the risk of serious heart issues. However, it did not consider patients' previous heart conditions, which are known to affect heart risk with abiraterone and enzalutamide.
For this reason, we are conducting a study using a large real-world database to compare the heart risks of abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide while considering patients' existing heart conditions and treatment duration.
Full description
In prostate cancer, both in metastatic settings and in many localized cases, androgen suppression via GnRH agonists or antagonists remains the cornerstone of treatment. These androgen deprivation therapies (ADT) aim to reduce circulating androgen levels.
In recent years, Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs) have emerged, prescribed in combination with standard androgen suppression therapy (ADT). These treatments have broad indications in metastatic settings and are now also used in localized high-risk prostate cancer.
A conventional distinction is made between abiraterone acetate, a selective inhibitor of androgen synthesis that blocks CYP 17, and other NGHTs that inhibit the androgen receptor, namely enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide. The indications for these treatments are often similar, with no clear evidence of superiority of one over another. For instance, in synchronous metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, when treated with NGHTs combined with AST, clinicians may choose between abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide. Thus, the safety profile of these treatments plays a crucial role in therapeutic decision-making. These new hormonal therapies have significantly improved patient survival.
However, when examining the causes of death among prostate cancer patients, studies have shown that 30% of deaths are due to cardiovascular causes, with an excess risk compared to the general population. It is therefore essential to investigate these cardiovascular events and their associations with administered treatments.
The meta-analysis by El-Taji et al. identified an increased risk of high-grade cardiovascular toxicities for all next-generation hormonal therapies (HR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.50-2.04). This excess risk was observed for each ARSI individually. However, this meta-analysis could not account for patients' cardiovascular history, despite demonstrated associations between pre-existing cardiovascular conditions and the risk of cardiovascular toxicity with abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide.
For these reasons, we have decided to compare cardiovascular toxicities associated with abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide using a large real-world database, taking into account pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities as well as treatment exposure duration.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
52,000 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal