Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This mixed methods study will utilize a randomized step-wedge design to assess the impact of point-of-care (POC) versus conventional early infant diagnosis (EID) on key outcomes including timely return of results to caregivers and time to initiation on treatment for HIV-infected infants. Data will be collected through longitudinal clinical follow-up and medical chart extraction of routine records and lab forms. Feasibility and acceptability data will be collected through interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants, and community focus groups.
Full description
This study seeks to evaluate the impact of point of care (POC) early infant HIV diagnosis (EID) on turn-around time from sample collection until notification of parents/caregivers of test result, linkage to care, and time to initiation of treatment, and early retention in HIV care (3-6 months) for those infected.
The study will take place in two countries, Zimbabwe and Kenya, with high HIV prevalence, and where EGPAF-supported POC EID platforms are being implemented as part of a Unitaid-funded POC EID project. As part of POC program implementation activities, in each country up to 50 EGPAF-supported sites will implement POC EID platforms. These sites may be prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV clinics, HIV clinics or multidisciplinary health facilities. Project sites have been selected as part of the program implementation. In each country, 18 sites will be randomly selected as study sites for the impact evaluation.
Using a stepped wedge design, the intervention (the POC EID platforms) will be rolled out sequentially to the study facilities over three randomly-assigned time periods. Quantitative data will be derived from routine medical and laboratory charts and longitudinal tracking and follow-up of HIV-infected infants.
Qualitative data on feasibility and acceptability of POC will be derived from in-depth interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants at the beginning and end of the study and community focus group discussions at the end of the study.
Enrollment
Sex
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
9,539 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal