Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is a clinical trial designed to understand how the way a dentist presents tooth color options affects a patient's final choice for their dental treatment. The insvestigators know that patients often prefer lighter, "bleached" shades, but the process of choosing can be influenced by the order in which the shades are shown.
The insvestigators will randomly dividing participants into three groups. One group will see natural shades first, followed by bleached shades. A second group will see bleached shades first, followed by natural shades. The third group will see all shades at once.
The main goal is to measure how often patients change their mind (switch their choice) and by how much (the "jump" in lightness) depending on the order of presentation. The insvestigators will also use a questionnaire to see if a patient's self-consciousness about their smile affects how light of a shade they choose. The results will help dentists improve communication and ensure patients are truly satisfied with their final aesthetic decision.
Full description
This is a prospective, single-center, three-arm parallel-group Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) designed to rigorously investigate the cognitive bias known as the "order effect" in patient-driven tooth shade selection. The study aims to quantify the influence of sequential versus simultaneous shade guide presentation on final aesthetic preference and to correlate this choice with the patient's underlying psychosocial perception of their dental aesthetics.
Methodology: Participants seeking aesthetic dental treatment will be randomized (1:1:1) into three intervention groups:
Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are the switching frequency and the magnitude of change (Delta L*) between initial and final selections in the sequential groups (A and B), and the comparison of the final proportion of bleached shade selections across all three groups. Secondary outcomes include the correlation between the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) total score and the final selected shade's L* value, and the quantification of the Patient-Clinician Discrepancy using CIE Delta E00 between the patient's choice and an independent clinician's recommendation.
Significance: This study will provide evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice, moving beyond anecdotal preference recording to a structured, bias-mitigating approach to shared aesthetic decision-making. The integration of the PIDAQ and objective colorimetric analysis (Lab*) and Delta E00 will provide a novel, high-impact explanation for the observed preference for lighter shades.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
300 participants in 3 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Alaa Al-Haddad, BDS, MSc, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal