Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Our primary aim is to compare the complication rates of patients with ankle fractures who underwent skin closure using a running subcuticular suture pattern compared to an interrupted suture pattern. At the time of the operation, participants will be assigned to either the Subcuticular Suture Group (SSG) or the Simple Interrupted Suture Group (SISG) using computer-generated randomization programs. The surgeon will perform the assigned closure technique using standardized techniques. Running subcuticular Vicryl 3-0 sutures will be placed on patients in the experimental group while simple interrupted Monocryl 3-0 sutures patients in our control group.
Patients will be followed up at the two-week and eight-week postoperative mark where we will use the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to evaluate and compare wound healing. Additionally, photographs of the scars will be captured to visually assess the healing progression.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
80 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
José Acosta, MD; Carlos Guevara, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal